Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Troops not served well by perpetuating hero myth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:57 PM
Original message
Troops not served well by perpetuating hero myth
On Nov. 11, Armistice Day, now called Veterans Day, members of Veterans for Peace erected and managed the somber display representing American soldiers killed in the illegal invasions/occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.

"We erected over 4,300 tombstones (in Olbrich Park) so that people can comprehend the magnitude of this tragedy and reflect upon its meaning," project co-chair Richard Chamberlin said ...

The scope of the tragedy expands exponentially when considering the defenseless civilians killed by our troops. It would require over 250 times more tombstones than were displayed. Our dead were, unwittingly or not, involved in that slaughter. So they're not heroes. In fact, they were victims in multiple ways. And when we parrot the media hype about "fallen heroes," we perpetuate victimization by promoting the continuation of the slaughter ...

Elton Tylenda of Madison is a teacher, writer and combat veteran of Vietnam and is a member of the Madison chapter of Veterans for Peace.

http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/column/260403
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Defending a nation is heroic. Invading one, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Defending isn't always heroic, either
Nazi Germany.

German soldiers may well have acted heroically while defending their homeland. I'm sure many did. For that many, I'm sure there were acts of battlefield heroism by German soldiers during their various invasions. Nonetheless, we don't think of them as heroes as defenders or aggressors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Its a sign of the glorification of war for war's sake
when everybody who served in the military in any capacity these days is labeled a "hero". After all, if everyone in the wartime military is a "hero", the war must be a righteous one, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. I guess 1.2 million Headstones for the Iraqis would be asking to much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. John Kerry's response to Sam Fox's "hero" label
Sam Fox: "And, Senator Kerry, I very much respect your dedicated service to this country. I know that you were not drafted -- you volunteered. You went to Vietnam. You were wounded. Highly decorated. Senator, you're a hero. And there isn’t anybody or anything that's going to take that away from you."

Sen. John Kerry: ...Mr. Fox, and I'm not looking for anyone to call me a hero. I think that most heroes died, and do die..."

http://bobgeiger.blogspot.com/2007/02/kerry-versus-swift-boat-benefactor.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Hero" has become one of those words so over-used that it's lost its meaning. Our
local news stations call any military person a 'hero'. Their recent campaign to mail Christmas packages constantly called for us to 'support our local heroes'. I think my uncles would have died of embarrassment had they been called 'heroes' for the their service in WWII.

'Hero' used to be reserved for someone who without regard to their own well-being, performed a miraculous feat to save someone or something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hero
I served for 23 years,I don't consider myself a hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC