Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Army) Bonus payments frozen (AT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:24 PM
Original message
(Army) Bonus payments frozen (AT)
Bonus payments frozen

more: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/01/army_bonuses_halted_080102w/

By Jim Tice - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Jan 3, 2008 7:47:39 EST

The Army has temporarily halted bonus payments for more than 20 enlistment, re-enlistment and service extension programs pending enactment of authorizing legislation.

President Bush, to the surprise of Congress and the Defense Department, vetoed the fiscal 2008 Defense Authorization Act on Dec. 29 after months bargaining with House and Senate leaders.

In announcing the pocket veto, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said the president objected to a single provision of the legislation that would delay the reconstruction of Iraq, and expose the Iraqi government to unwarranted law suits in U.S. courts.

If enacted as currently written, the legislation would authorize $696.3 billion in defense spending during 2008, including $1 billion for Army accession and retention bonuses.

Until a new version of the legislation is enacted, all new bonus agreements signed on, or after, Jan. 1 must include an addendum that stipulates the soldier’s eligibility for a future bonus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Support the Troops, Hooah!
Damn, I feel like standing up and singing the God Bless the Pledge of Allegiance Anthem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. By golly, any day now
limbaugh and hannity and the rest of the chickenhawk noise machine will take bush to the woodshed for not supporting the troops. He supported the troops before he didn't. And conseratives have sold the lemmings on the notion that they know how to manage money??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet, looks like the contractors are still rakin it in ....
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 04:45 PM by sjdnb
a scan of Google news shows ...

Lockheed Martin awarded $141 million missile system contract with ...
CNNMoney.com - 4 hours ago

Army hands Raytheon $18M more for detection systems Mass High Tech ... Bizjournals.com

Boeing Gets $1.3B Deal for C-17 Fleet Houston Chronicle

and, many more.

The Bush Admin response:

Bush Defense Authorization Veto Could Hamper Contracting Reforms
Jan 3, 2008
John M. Doyle/Aerospace Daily & Defense Report

Pathetic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought bush could not pocket veto legislation across Christmas because ...
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 05:06 PM by Jim__
... Congress stayed in session. My understanding ( I think Senator Kerry wrote an article on this) is that the pocket veto is only effective if Congress adjourns. If he didn't sign the bill and congress is in session, the bill becomes law.

This may be another Constitutional fight. here's a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. The brainwashed military
still love their awol cic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC