Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Forgotten Rich - Estate Tax

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:05 AM
Original message
The Forgotten Rich - Estate Tax
The Senate budget debate began this week against a backdrop of war and recession, rising unemployment and surging foreclosures, runaway health care costs and diminishing insurance coverage — to name just a few of the nation’s big problems. But for Senator Blanche Lincoln, Democrat of Arkansas, and Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, the most pressing issue is clear: America’s wealthiest families need help. Now.

The two senators plan to propose an amendment to deeply cut estate taxes for the fraction of the top 1 percent of the population still subject to those levies.

The proverbial millionaires next door — the plumbers, contractors and accountants who amass substantial wealth through hard work and modest living — are not the intended beneficiaries of the proposed cut. The Obama budget already takes care of them, because it retains today’s law, which imposes the estate tax only on couples with property worth more than $7 million, or individuals with property worth more than $3.5 million. That means 99.8 percent of estates will never — ever — pay a penny of estate tax.

The heirs of the remaining 0.2 percent of estates are who Ms. Lincoln and Mr. Kyl are so worried about. Their amendment would increase to $10 million the level at which the estate tax kicks in. It would also lower the top estate-tax rate to 35 percent from 45 percent.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/opinion/02thu1.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is insulting.
To put forward something like that, during these times... disgusting and insulting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. These massive, generational, fortune transferals SHOULD
Edited on Thu Apr-02-09 11:11 AM by annabanana
be taxed, a lot.

The recipient has done nothing, nothing but exist, and these huge lakes of capital distort the social fabric to near breaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I firmly believe that such transferred wealth is a form of "royalty" couched in "property rights" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Of course it is. The initial reason for it was to
Edited on Thu Apr-02-09 11:21 AM by redqueen
guard against the growth of an aristocracy.

Oh well... Jefferson tried, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. The really rich will never pay it anyway
They hire attorneys and accountants who specialize in this area and figure out ways to hide, move or transfer assets so they are not part of the estate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That doesn't mean we shouldn't have one....
Someone who wants to kill someone will figure out a way to do it.
Doesn't mean we shouldn't outlaw murder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Whart really needs to done is to massively SIMPLIFY the tax system
It way too complex. The people in charge of it do not know it as well as those who have specialized tax accountants and lawyers. Gut it and start over and build a simple progressive system that can not be easily gotten round. Estate taxes should be reviewed as part of that process and applied as reasonable.

No I am not advocating the Forbes Fair Tax plan, but they have some good points about the complexity which clearly favors the rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC