Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Horowitz’s Latest Attack on Higher Ed ‘Inaccurate, Distorted’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 10:45 AM
Original message
David Horowitz’s Latest Attack on Higher Ed ‘Inaccurate, Distorted’
Free Exchange on Campus, a coalition of 23 unions, faculty and student organizations and progressive policy groups, is setting the record straight about the shoddy research and erroneous conclusions in David Horowitz’s latest book, “One Party Classroom.”

As he does in his previous books, Horowitz, an extremist right-winger, attacks public universities and claims they brainwash students and turn them against their parents and country.

In “Facts Still Count,” the coalition says Horowitz’s outlandish claims are based on misrepresentations and distortions of the work of faculty members. The report says he has used this fallacious evidence to push an agenda that has the potential to chill the free exchange of ideas on college campuses. Click here to download the report.

According to Free Exchange on Campus, whose members include the AFL-CIO, AFT and the National Education Association (NEA):

Horowitz’s agenda is nothing more than an attack on the professional integrity of college faculty and strikes at the issue of professional control and academic freedom, two pillars of higher education.

In particular, the report checks the facts that Horowitz uses to condemn public universities and uncovers how he distorts reality. For example:

* Horowitz continually uses inaccurate copies of course descriptions, intentionally omits sections of course descriptions and simply misquotes course descriptions, when claiming that a course, department or faculty member’s work is inappropriate for higher education. With a lack of accurate evidence, his conclusions fail to hold water.

* One of Horowitz’s repeated tactics involves citing the reading list of a course as evidence that it is used to indoctrinate rather than educate—typically because his representation of the reading list contains only perspectives of which he disapproves. However, in numerous examples, Horowitz’s account literally leaves out books and reading assignments that would disprove his claims.

The bottom line, according to the coalition:

Horowitz makes exaggerated claims based on faulty and distorted evidence. While the rest of the country is discussing higher education’s role in an economic recovery, Horowitz is rehashing the same old discredited story. It’s time to move on.

AFL-CIO: http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/04/15/horowitzs-latest-attack-on-higher-ed-inaccurate-distorted/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. What made Horowitz turn righty?
What got him on this strange path? He was a lefty earlier in his life.

Turning students against their parents? What a claim! Is he saying that everything taught at Universities is left, therefore the kids turn against their parents? The assumption in that is that having open debate on points of view is brainwashing, and also an assumption that all "parents" are complete righties (don't any Democrats have college-aged kids???) who have such superficial relationships with their children that a college course that offers a different point of view can destroy that bond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. His was a classic path of many leading NeoCons.
I'm not a psychologist, but I'd bet this repeating pattern among NeoCons of rejecting parents and existing authorities in favor or radical personal views is some sort of discernable psychotic syndrome.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Which may be why he thinks university courses can turn
students against their parents. Pure projection due to his rejection of his parents.

Politics doesn't have to destroy relationships. People can have differences of opinions and still love each other. It is so narrow minded when people view opinions as the equivalent of a person, if you "turn against" someone's political opinion you have "turned against" that human being. So shallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. he figured out there was more money to be made praising the King
than in criticizing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theblasmo Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Blinded By The Right
If you haven't, you might want to read David Brock's extremely well written book with that title. He goes to great lengths to show how he went from left to right to back again. Horowitz just never had the moral awakening Brock did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks!
I will look into that book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bear poop found in the woods. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Little pissants like Horowitz and his minions might be the
ones to spark a civil war. Let's be ready when it comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Horowitz appears to be engaged in a "straw man" attack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC