Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poor Oprah

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:06 AM
Original message
Poor Oprah
Poor Oprah
By David Glenn Cox



Oprah Winfrey has traversed America; she is the epitome of the American dream. But for everything that we gain in life, we must give up an equal amount. If we are ambitious we work long hours and forget how to relax and how to allot time for family and friends, because our goals entrap us.

Winfrey, early in her broadcasting career, fought the battles of a being an African American woman struggling for employment in an industry controlled entirely by white men. Winfrey persevered to become the most successful woman broadcaster in America. She is admired, rich and powerful but in her sojourn to reach this pinnacle she has forgotten a few things.

She has forgotten that while it is perfectly acceptable in America to give everyone in the studio audience a new car, it is not acceptable to expose America to the poor. This is America, decadence is encouraged; lavishing wealth on the unsuspecting or building monstrous buildings at the old college alma mater is perfectly acceptable behavior for the wealthy.

Ms. Winfrey recently, in an honest and sincere attempt to enlighten her audience about homelessness in America, ran a story about a tent city in Sacramento, California. Winfrey forgot that the media is about illusion, not illustration. We want a picture of the truth, not the actual truth. Had Winfrey done her story about one man or woman, it would have been perfectly acceptable. One person can be anybody and is allowed under the adage that it could happen to anybody. Winfreys faux pas was showing groups of poor and homeless and that is not allowed. Just like American war casualties are never allowed to be shown on TV. Reality is much too frightening for the American public.

The media spoon-feeds us reality; news stories are promoted or discounted, based not on their news-worthiness but on how they color the overall picture presented for America's consumption. A baby food gruel of good news like, Stocks Rise on Better Than Expected Ford Numbers. Ford lost less money than was expected, and it was presented as good news.

Last week David Barstow of the New York Times won a Pulitzer Prize for his investigative report on how the broadcast media had used retired military admirals and generals as expert commentators. He revealed how those commentators had been co-opted by the Pentagon to promote the military's agenda in Iraq and Afghanistan. Barstows accomplishment has been met by a media wall of silence. As the broadcast media discussed the Pulitzers on air, Barstows name and story were omitted.

Barstow exposed the myth machine of how the media and the military, working hand in glove, promoted a false agenda to the American public. War is good business for the media. CNNs ratings soared during the first Gulf War and ratings mean money, money, money!

I read a recent headline, Rats Feed Off British Recession as Trash goes Uncollected. That was, I will borrow a term from Deek Jackson, not a headline but a head lie, a message designed to evoke an emotional response under the guise of information. The story told of the trials and tribulations in London and how the rat population is exploding due to the economic downturn. The underlying message was Arent you glad that youre not there? But we have the same economic crisis here in America. Arent the rats in New York or Boston or Chicago as successful or ambitious as their European cousins?

This was Winfreys error; when showing the homeless to the American public they must be illustrated as defectives. Grizzled old men, minorities, the mentally ill and the drug addicted with the message being, its all their fault. Just as those who are losing their homes and joining those ranks, should never have bought those homes in the first place.

There is the fundamental class distinction in America; if you are successful youve earned it all by yourself, and if you are unsuccessful you deserve what you get. The poor in New Orleans were lambasted for not leaving even though in many cases they didnt have access to transportation. But the subtle message comes through again and again, this country offers no help mostly because the real problems are ignored by the media. If the problem is ignored by the media then there is no public support to rectify the problem. Hence the homeless are only shown as grizzled old winos, crack heads and head cases.

In Orange County, California families that once owned homes and rented three bedroom apartments are living seven to a hundred-square-foot hotel room. Little white children and their mothers sometimes holding infants line up for soup kitchens and on some days they are turned away. Donations are falling as fast as demand is rising. Eight hundred thousand new notices of foreclosure have gone out in the first three months of the year.

All across America the problem is exploding yet the media only deals with it in the abstract. They do not dare put a real face on it because to do so would be to expose the grand lie, Americans are the most generous people in the whole wide world, when nothing could be further from the truth. This issue, this crisis which has been ignored has been drowned out by sniveling and wailing and gnashing of teeth over tax increases that would put levels for the rich back where they were before the federal deficit exploded to record levels.

But even more than generosity, where is our integrity as a nation? What does a nation owe its people in the largest man-made economic calamity in a century? According to the media, nothing! And even more than nothing, their contempt and derision. Move along, be gone from here! Go and hide because if I see you hanging around here again, Ill run you in! On a highway billboard sponsored by FEMA was the stark message, Make an emergency plan translated, youre on your own sucker, dont look at us! What a novel idea, four million Atlantans with individual emergency plans.

Poor Oprah, she tried to do a good thing; her heart was in the right place. But she erred when she forgot about how America treats those not so rich and powerful. After Oprahs program aired city officials moved quickly to rectify the situation. Sacramento mayor Kevin Johnson ordered police to clear the tent city from the vacant lot, promising that the city would make every effort to find alternative shelters.

But they had shelters, Mayor; what they need are jobs! Theyve heard the promises before, but what good is a promise that takes away what you have now and leaves only an assurance that youll have more later? It is the American dream and these people dont believe in dreams any more than they believe in Oprah or in Santa Claus.

Meanwhile the spoon-fed scratch their heads in wonder. Now why would someone want to murder their whole family or shoot at policemen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Switch channels to Larry Kudlow
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I Don't Consider Kudlow
a human being as much as a corporate drone with a drug problem. He spouts and shouts and barks on his masters commands. He is fodder for a lamp post to prove that they can illuminate with more than just a light bulb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to see Oprah continue to show this side of our country
She should keep the names of the cities private. That way the peple won't be displaced (again), which proves nothing except more heartache and hassle to them.

Does it matter where the tent city is? No, it only matters that it's in America. It's a disgrace whether it's in Sacramento or Boston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
il_lilac Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
just too true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Our social self perception is reflected in the distorted mirror of corporate media.
This author is right on the money and as he points out this isn't only true in regards to the economy. Often, even here at DU, I see people surprised, even shocked, to discover that the corporate news doesn't tell them the truth, or only tells it to a very limited and relatively superficial extent. They ask, "Why aren't the media doing their job?" as if "their job" is to inform and empower the public. That isn't their job. Their job is to manage public perception. Chomsky:
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable public opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that theres free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. You have a link for this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. The OP is the author. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks, I didn't realize that!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Link here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well done.
Unfortunately, I missed the episode in question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Brilliant. Thanks for posting. n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you have any doubts about this........ Homeless people are treated with DISGUST

The Empathy Gap by J.D. Trout 2009
p. 30 In the research of Fisk and her colleagues, people were asked how different social groups are viewed by their society. When asked a series of questions about social warmth and the competency of different social and ethnic groups, the answers clustered around four emotional responses: pity, envy, pride, and disgust. For example, people routinely reach to the homeless with disgust. This is puzzling enough. You might have thought people would pity the homeless, empathize with their position, and feel sorry for them. Not at all. And in a functional MRI study, when study participants were presented with pictures of members from each social and ethnic group, the medial prefrontal cortex--the site that registers the potential for an object's social action--popped for all but one group: the homeless. The homeless maybe seen as human, but not fully so, not as social actors.14

The question is, what are we going to do about it?

Ignore it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Please remember the obvious--not everyone needs jobs!
How old should you be before you can not work anymore? 85? 90? Do you really want old people HAVING to work? Really?

What about people who are disabled and unable to work? Send 'em to the glue factory?

Please remember.... there are some very obvious points here that are being overlooked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. The poor need justice.
This is about civil rights. And a real commitment to the ideals we claim to hold dear. The poor need justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 25th 2020, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC