Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reagan's DOJ Prosecuted Texas Sheriff for Waterboarding Prisoners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 04:22 PM
Original message
Reagan's DOJ Prosecuted Texas Sheriff for Waterboarding Prisoners
http://www.truthout.org/042709J

Reagan's DOJ Prosecuted Texas Sheriff for Waterboarding Prisoners

Monday 27 April 2009

by: Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t | Report


George W. Bush's Justice Department said subjecting a person to the near drowning of waterboarding was not a crime and didn't even cause pain, but Ronald Reagan's Justice Department thought otherwise, prosecuting a Texas sheriff and three deputies for using the practice to get confessions.

snip//

Texas Trial

At the trial of the Texas sheriff, Assistant US Attorney Scott Woodward said the prisoners who were subjected to waterboarding were not "model citizens," but they were still "victims" of torture.

"We make no bones about it. The victims of these crimes are criminals," Woodward said, according to a copy of the trial transcript. One of the "victims" was Vernell Harkless, who was convicted of burglary in 1977.

Gregg Magee, a deputy sheriff who testified against Sheriff Parker and three of the deputies said he witnessed Harkless being handcuffed to a chair by Parker and then getting "the water treatment."

"A towel was draped over his head," Magee said, according to court documents. "He was pulled back in the chair and water was poured over the towel."

Harkless said he thought he was "going to be strangled to death," adding: "I couldn't breathe."

One of the defendants, Deputy Floyd Allen Baker, said during the trial that he thought torture to be an immoral act, but he was unaware that it was illegal. His attorneys cited the "Nuremberg defense," that Baker was acting on orders from his superiors when he subjected prisoners to waterboarding.

That line of defense has come up in the current debate about whether CIA interrogators should be prosecuted for their roles in the torture of detainees. President Obama, CIA Director Leon Panetta and Attorney General Eric Holder have ruled out prosecuting CIA interrogators who acted on Justice Department legal advice.

Some other legal analysts have suggested that the ambiguity of the Bush administration's decision process - in which CIA interrogators suggested the harsh tactics, national security officials, including Condoleezza Rice, concurred, and Justice Department lawyers gave their approval - would make getting 12 jurors to agree on a conviction difficult.

But the jury in the Baker's case didn't buy the "didn't know it was illegal" defense, convicting the deputy on three counts of civil rights and constitutional violations related to the waterboarding.

Bybee is now a federal judge on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. Yoo is a constitutional law professor at the University of California, Berkeley and a visiting professor at Chapman University in Orange, California.

Bradbury, who was acting head of the Office of Legal Counsel for most of Bush's second term, reportedly has been looking for a job since Bush left office on January 20, 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Beat me to the post

K&R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Join the Greatest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does anyone else just feel sad---
that we have had to waste so much time, effort, ink and airtime supposedly debating whether or not waterboarding is torture?
I mean, Jesus H. Christ, people! Do we, in some sense, "dignify" this bullshit by taking the time to explain and cite all the times we, "the good guys", have prosecuted, convicted, incarcerated---hell, even executed people who did this EXACT SAME THING!! But, don't we have to speak out against the soulless bastards who are trying to persuade the brain-dead segment of the US public that simply renaming something, i.e., "enhanced interrogation" changes its nature---alters its essence? (See: "enemy combatants")

I guess it just gets lumped into "outrage fatigue". People are so overwhelmed---numbed---by the past eight years of "fucked-upedness" that we just sigh and move away when people start justifying the crime by erroneously arguing that "it works".

Sorry for the downer. Just having a bad week with this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-27-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I hate to say it but it may get worse. With all the horrendous outrage I still don't feel that we
are getting closer to prosecutions. Pelosi and Reid want a white wash commission. The President hasn't shown he favors any kind of investigation. I think the fix is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's torture. The 'fast' media hasn't been in a rush to rush this. Imagie that.
Yes, lots of outrage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC