What is this guy smoking, he doesn't even mention that we already killed hundreds in Fallujah, isn't that enough to avenge the four mercenaries?
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,9198898%5E7583,00.html
THE similarity struck everyone right away: Mogadishu, October 3, 1993; Fallujah, March 31, 2004. But we cannot permit these two outrages to be similar in their effect. At this key moment, the Bush administration has to ensure that the reactions to Fallujah and Mogadishu go down in the history books as studies in contrast, not in similarity.
Mogadishu triggered, in a few months, the withdrawal of US troops from Somalia and victory for those who killed US soldiers. Slaughter in Rwanda followed in a few months – a slaughter The Economist (on the 10th anniversary) has called "the purest genocide since 1945 and perhaps the single greatest act of evil since Pol Pot turned Cambodia into a killing field". The Economist further noted that the "West's reluctance to get involved was largely a consequence of America's shambolic intervention in Somalia the previous year". Or more precisely: a consequence of the US's humiliating retreat from Somalia.
Mogadishu encouraged Osama bin Laden in his judgment that the US was a "weak horse", a nation that could not take casualties. Mogadishu therefore deserves a place of dishonour at the head of a decade of failures to respond seriously to attacks against US soldiers, diplomats and citizens.
more...