Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman: Travesty of Justice (Ashcroft plus Siebel Edmunds case)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:51 PM
Original message
Krugman: Travesty of Justice (Ashcroft plus Siebel Edmunds case)
Edited on Mon Jun-14-04 10:54 PM by rmpalmer
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/15/opinion/15KRUG.html?pagewanted=print&position=

No question: John Ashcroft is the worst attorney general in history.

For this column, let's just focus on Mr. Ashcroft's role in the fight against terror. Before 9/11 he was aggressively uninterested in the terrorist threat. He didn't even mention counterterrorism in a May 2001 memo outlining strategic priorities for the Justice Department. When the 9/11 commission asked him why, he responded by blaming the Clinton administration, with a personal attack on one of the commission members thrown in for good measure.

We can't tell directly whether Mr. Ashcroft's post 9/11 policies are protecting the United States from terrorist attacks. But a number of pieces of evidence suggest otherwise.

First, there's the absence of any major successful prosecutions. The one set of convictions that seemed fairly significant — that of the "Detroit 3" — appears to be collapsing over accusations of prosecutorial misconduct. (The lead prosecutor has filed a whistle-blower suit against Mr. Ashcroft, accusing him of botching the case. The Justice Department, in turn, has opened investigations against the prosecutor. Payback? I report, you decide.)

Then there is the lack of any major captures. Somewhere, the anthrax terrorist is laughing. But the Justice Department, you'll be happy to know, is trying to determine whether it can file bioterrorism charges against a Buffalo art professor whose work includes harmless bacteria in petri dishes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this.
Edited on Mon Jun-14-04 11:10 PM by spenbax
Why in the world hasn't this joke of a man been fired - Ashcroft, that is, not Krugman. This one man is making a mockery of Congress and I can't believe they act like they don't know what to do about it. It just feels like we're doomed and everything's hopeless. God, I'm so embarrassed for them and us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. About as bad as it gets
When you're the worst Attorney General ever, that means you're lower than pond scum such as Edwin Meese, and John Mitchell. Even lower than the most inept, Reagans first AG, William French Smith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. The New York Times has finally realized something that we've already
known for over three years? Where have they been? Oh, I remember. Kissing the bush* administration's ass.

Funny, they're part of the reason we're in this fix. And now they've decided to inform us on the obvious fact that Asscroft in a criminal idiot. If they hadn't given these bastards as pass on all the stuff they've pulled so far, maybe the arrogant bastards wouldn't have gotten so brazen and out-of-control.

If bush* hadn't given Asscroft a job, he would be just some crazed fundy nobody ranting without an audience. And if organizations like the New York Times hadn't covered for bush* during the election and the aftermath, out poor country wouldn't be an internation pariah. The only redeeming feature of all this is maybe, just maybe, it will open the eyes of some of those who are sitting on the fence trying to decide who to vote for in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. well, there's the NYT and then there is Krugman.....
Krugman has been sane the entire time and echoing everything we have noted and said (although often in a more eloquent way)....

Krugman is the main reason I still read NYT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. that's right
fair is fair -- Krugman has been all over this administration like white on rice. The ONLY thing I credit the NY Times for in the first three years of this administration is allowing Krugman's words to appear on their pages.
Beyond that, their dereliction of duty has been close to criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patriotvoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Impossible: "The NY Times leads the charge of media's strong liberal bias"
I hear that frequently.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Remember
Ashcroft lost an election to a dead man. That ought to say a lot about how the people of Missouri view him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great article!
Ashcroft isn't just a right wing ideologue.

He's a screw up.

I love Paul Krugman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patriotvoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I know why he still has a job.
He's the best vocalist Attorney General we've ever had.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another excellent piece by Krugman
Long after the junta is ousted, Krugman will be regarded as one of those who in this time stood against tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC