Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Special Prosecutor Needed to Investigate the Bush-Torture Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 11:51 AM
Original message
Special Prosecutor Needed to Investigate the Bush-Torture Scandal
Today's Earthside Commentary:

Special Prosecutor Needed to Investigate the Bush-Torture Scandal

It is becoming evident that a special prosecutor MUST be appointed to investigate George W. Bush's involvement in the "war on terror" torture scandal. A special prosecutor is essential because, by reading former congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman's commentary one can easily infer that if Bush were responsible for the approval of a torture order, he could be indicted, tried, and found guilty of violating America's War Crimes Act of 1996. If found guilty of torture or abuse that resulted in a fatality, Bush could even be sentenced to his favorite punishment - the death penalty. (Just imagine Bush pleading: "Please don't kill me" ... just as he, himself, while governor of Texas, mocked condemned murderer and born-again Christian, Carla Fay Tucker.)

What is the likelihood of this outcome? Fairly probable if justice is done and people of good conscience do the right thing. Two developments show why Bush is potentially in so much trouble. First, the memos leaked thus far indicate that White House and Justice Department lawyers believed it was important that Bush sign-off on the unique interpretation of law that would allow torture and thus violate the Geneva Conventions. That was because the lawyers were concerned that without the presidential 'okay', others (perhaps even the lawyers, even John Ashcroft) would be subject to possible war crimes or conspiracy charges. How difficult is it then to conclude, knowing how the Bush gang operates, that Bush did sign such an order, never expecting it to see the light of day. Second, Ashcroft's refusal to provide the U.S. Senate with further documents relevant to the leaked memos, is a sign that there is indeed something explosive to cover-up. And isn't it interesting that Ashcroft did not invoke Executive Privilege when refusing to provide the papers. But, of course, using the 'privilege' (which can only be claimed by the president) would have meant that he actually consulted with Bush about the 'problem' - so ending the defense of presidential ignorance.

So there it is. Ashcroft's cover-up in the Valerie Plame case and his stonewalling in this torture scandal demonstrates that he will never impartially and thoroughly investigate these possible crimes - with the prospect of such serious punishment for George W. Bush. A special prosecutor is essential if this nation is to bring the truth to light and begin the process of restoring America's honor ... the reputation that George W. Bush has so cynically soiled.

Dave Chandler
www.Earthside.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. It just struck me: just maybe Ashcroft and the other neocons think
they are never going to give up power, so they can violate the laws of the land, international law, the Constitution, be in contempt of Congress, so what, for I suspect in their view no one is ever going to hold them accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC