Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The harm the U.S. does in rationalizing torture (Globe and Mail)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:40 PM
Original message
The harm the U.S. does in rationalizing torture (Globe and Mail)
Two broad legal justifications for torture are now said to be available to the United States in its war on terrorism. The first is the president's "complete authority over the conduct of war." The second is self-defence: creating one harm where it is necessary to avoid a greater harm, even when there is no immediate danger such as a ticking bomb.
<snip>

This is frightening for many reasons. It is frightening because it fits so neatly with other legal strategies of the Bush administration. The government has sought to put many of its prisoners in the war on terrorism beyond the reach of the law. At Guantanamo Bay, for instance, inmates are "enemy combatants," with neither the prisoner-of-war protections of the Geneva Conventions nor the due-process protections given accused criminals. They are in a legal black hole. Two U.S. citizens held in U.S. jails without charge or, until recently, access to lawyers or judicial review, Yaser Hamdi and Jose Padilla, are in a similar black hole. Maher Arar of Ottawa, shipped out of the United States to Syria under orders of the deputy attorney-general, also fell into the post-Sept.-11 black hole. In that black hole, the concept of human dignity is rendered meaningless.
<snip>

This genie cannot easily be put back into the bottle. Abu Ghraib damaged the United States' image in the Middle East, but the insistence on a "right to torture" does far greater harm. If the United States can claim that right, so too can any number of tyrannies, and other democracies under threat of terror.

The prohibition against torture has come to seem an immutable law of civilized societies. Now this law may fall to a vision of necessity. That is a frightening vision on which to build this new century.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040612/ETORTURE12/TPComment/Editorials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. By your fruit shall ye be known: this seems to beg the question as to
whether we in BushWorld are among the civilized societies whose immutable law prohibits torture, to wit, are we now a civilized society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am afraid we have entered yet another long dark night of the soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC