Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plenty More to Swear About

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 02:35 PM
Original message
Plenty More to Swear About
Plenty More to Swear About
Bush's security team faces a barrage of criticism as the facts about Iraq come to light



Saturday, Jun. 26, 2004
The Vulcans—a campaign 2000 nickname for George w. Bush's hawkish national security team—went Krakatoa last week. Dick Cheney erupted on the Senate floor, deploying the F word against Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy, who had been belaboring the Vice President over the no-bid deals that Cheney's old company, Halliburton, had scored in Iraq. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz suffered a meltdown in a House Armed Services Committee hearing, blasting the press for "sitting in Baghdad" and "printing rumors." (He later apologized.) And the White House was forced to acknowledge that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had approved, at least for a while, the use of dogs, nudity, stress positions—that is, torture—against enemy combatants. Indeed, Rumsfeld, who works at a stand-up desk, indicated a desire for at least one more strenuous stress position: "I stand 8-10 hours a day," he scrawled on a memo. "Why is standing limited to 4 hours?"



The torture investigation is one of four major defensive battles the Administration is facing. In the weeks to come, the White House will also have to deal with the 9/11 commission's final report, the congressional investigations into the CIA's bungled assessment of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and a special prosecutor's hunt for the White House leakers who blew the cover of CIA secret operative Valerie Plame. Not only is the Administration defending itself against the Democrats, the investigators and the media. Two other serious, surreptitious—and quite possibly unprecedented—battles are going on: the intelligence community is at war with the White House, and the uniformed military is at war with the civilian leadership of the Pentagon. The first conflict went public last week with news of the impending publication of Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terrorism, a book by an anonymous author who is known to be a senior CIA official and former chief of the agency's Osama bin Laden station. The invasion of Iraq was "an avaricious, premeditated, unprovoked war against a foe who posed no immediate threat," the author writes. "There is nothing that bin Laden could have hoped for more than the American invasion and occupation of Iraq."

Michael Moore couldn't have said it any better—and this book was vetted by CIA censors. In fact, the views of Anonymous are an accurate reflection of the opinions I've heard from multiple intelligence sources. The spooks seem to believe that outgoing CIA Director George Tenet was strong-armed by Cheney and Rumsfeld into overassessing Iraq's WMD capacity. This may or may not be true, but it is the conventional wisdom in the intelligence community. Furthermore, there is intense anger over the White House's revealing the identity of Plame, who may have been active in a sting operation involving the trafficking of WMD components. Plame was outed in a White House attempt to discredit the finding of her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, that there was no evidence that Iraq tried to buy yellowcake uranium from Niger. "Only a very high-ranking official could have had access to the knowledge that Plame was on the payroll" of the CIA, an intelligence source told me.

The military has made no secret of its fury with Rumsfeld and his coterie of neoconservatives at the Pentagon. Rumsfeld has been faulted for committing too few troops and too little planning to postwar Iraq. Returning National Guard leaders have been telling their congressional representatives about chaos in the field. There is also some rustling among the brass about General Tommy Franks' memoir, to be published in August. Bob Woodward reported that Franks once called Under Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith, who was charged with postwar planning, "the stupidest guy on the face of the earth," and some defense experts are wondering if Franks, who has a reputation for candor, will elaborate on that.




more
http://www.time.com/time/columnist/klein/article/0,9565,658285,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks! nice article. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bagnana Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "Cheney expletive" stupidest guy
on the face of this earth. Love that. Dick Cheney associated with "fuck". Vice President Fuck, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. from Time mag?? sweet! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. At long f*cking last, the media covers the Vulcans...
and how many times have we all written to the media and told them to cover this in the last couple of years????????????
How many times??????????? How many times have I written to the Post, Newsweek, Time, and all the other news stations and media sources and demanded they cover PNAC, the Vulcans, the Straussian agenda, everything I knew a long time ago??????????????
NOW it comes out??????????
Im sickened. Im glad its out, but Im sickened it took this long...just sickened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. If something doesn't come from these four areas of conflict
Edited on Sun Jun-27-04 03:55 PM by JudiLyn
we are ALL screwed.

Four collossal easily defined completely unacceptable situations. Each one should be examined thoroughly and with complete transparency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. And perhaps there is a fifth area, that might enrage fiscal conservatives:

the unacceptably vague accounting of billions spent in Iraq. This scandal has not yet been developed, but seems to me to have a delightful potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. US ignored bin Laden
Washington - A 22-year CIA veteran who headed an anti-terror task force focusing on capturing Osama bin Laden said in an interview broadcast Sunday that "bureaucratic cowardice" impeded action against al-Qaeda before and after September 11.

"Since there had only been one man or entity on the earth that had declared war on (the United States) since 1996 and had attacked us seven or eight times between (1996) and the World Trade Center (attack on September 11, 2001) I would've somehow hoped that the military would've been prepared to respond in some fashion," the CIA official told ABC's "This Week."

The official has published a book entitled "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror," whose author is "Anonymous."

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1548957,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. What we've created is a Mujahedeen magnet in Iraq
US-led invasion of Iraq was the greatest diversion bin Laden ever could have hoped for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. From the second-stupidest guy on the face of the earth...
...something from one of the smartest to ever walk it:



http://www.networkingtheinternet.com/zxm187.htm

Thanks for the great article, seemslikeadream! The Big Mo' builds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Clearly an Editorial piece. Moving to Editorial/Other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC