talkingpointsmemo -Niger uranium - FT article - and Safire lies

[papau]

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

(notorious Niger uranium forgeries)...The FT story is yet to have been picked up by other news outlets in the United States but it has become a matter of acute interest and frenzied promotion for what I guess we'd call certain interested parties in Washington. And I half suspect that one of them put Safire on to his piece.<snip>

(Safire)..."A close reading of the article suggests the original human source was Italian, whose tip was confirmed by British and French electronic intercepts. C.I.A. analysts, who often disdain data not gathered by us, ignored the real thing until they were suckered by the forged documents."

That's astonishing. Is that really how it happened? Not really.

This is an object lesson in how if you're going to run with a story based largely on disinformation from two foreign intelligence services, it's worth cranking up the Nexis database at least to get yourself up to speed on what's already known about the story. Otherwise, things can really get messy.

As is known, even from published sources, the Italians first sent Washington their reports about alleged sales of uranium from Niger to Iraq in late 2001. The FT article and Safire suggest that this choice information was ignored by the CIA."

Not so.


There's a lot of disinformation coming down the pike on this and related stories. Safire is just the peddler of the day, enabled by the fact that he's either uninterested or indifferent to checking out the facts of the story. <snip>

[The_Casual_Observer]

1. Shows that this was such an embarrassment that they can't let it go

This story has more lives than a cat. The real problem here is that they want the public to believe that on the one hand this was all an intelligence failure and not the fault of the WH, and on the other hand these stories still have credibility. This of course is meant to confuse you and I, to distract us from the fact that the imperial invasion had nothing to do with any of it.

[ewagner]

2. "Confusion to your enemies"

This doesn't sound as much like a story but a technique.

Obfuscate

Plant the seeds of doubt and you can't be called a liar.

[papau]

3. I agree - it is a technique approved by the US Media :-)

:-)