Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America's Forgotten Liberal - HHH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:08 PM
Original message
America's Forgotten Liberal - HHH
(Back in my old Socialist days, I attended a labor march & rally in D.C. The rally was held in RFK stadium. Humphrey was one of the speakers. An audience member ran onto the grass, which was roped off. 2 security guards quickly tackled the guy but then one of the guards drew his pistol. There was a very loun "NO!" from the crowd and immediately, thousands rushed the field (I was among them).
We continued the rush up to the speakers platform. All of the speakers huddled at the back of the speaking platform. I'll never forget the look of terror on Humphrey's face! No one was hurt. - gd)

JANUARY was the 100th anniversary of Ronald Reagan’s birth, and the planet nearly stopped turning on its axis to recognize the occasion. Today is the 100th anniversary of Hubert H. Humphrey’s birth, and no one besides me seems to have noticed.

That such a central figure in American history is largely ignored today is sad. But his diminution is also, more importantly, an impediment to understanding our current malaise as a nation, and how much better things might have been had today’s America turned out less Reaganite and more Humphreyish.

Our forgotten man was born in eastern South Dakota to a pharmacist, a trade the son took over after the family moved to Minnesota. That biographical fact was the source for the derisive title of a 1968 biography, “The Drugstore Liberal” — that is to say, like a “drugstore cowboy,” a small-timer, not really a liberal at all, at a time, quite unlike our own, when a liberal reputation was a prerequisite for the Democratic presidential nomination. The unfairness was evident only in retrospect.

Humphrey made his national political debut in 1948 when, as mayor of Minneapolis and a candidate for Senate, he headed the Minnesota delegation to the Democratic National Convention. There he led a faction insisting the platform include a federal fair employment commission, a controversial goal of the civil rights movement.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/opinion/27Perlstein.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha212
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. He and Johnson did themselves in by their resolute commitment to the Vietnam War
The anti-communist crusade had many victims, on all sides. But, Humphrey earned his stripes in the Battle Against the Red Menace as the leader of the faction of the Democratic machine that purged the real socialists from Wisconsin politics and unions during the 1946 elections and thereafter.

He became known as "The Happy Warrior", which had several meanings for him over time.

He was a Liberal Democrat, not a Progressive. That distinction remains to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Happy Warrior was a casualty of the Vietnam War
Being LBJ's VP he was tied to that administration's war policy -- the opposition to which was violently on display in the streets of Chicago at the 1968 Democratic convention.

HHH was a good man caught up in our nation's worst tragedy since the Civil War. The promise of the 1960's was sacrificed on the altar of the Domino Theory and the Military Industrial Complex, and Republicans held the White House for 5 of the next 6 terms.

All that followed and that which we suffer today is a consequence of what we wasted and squandered and destroyed in that tragic military misadventure in Southeast Asia.

And our new longest war is still underway in south central Asia.

Collectively, we have learned nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I read he would have pulled us out of Viet Nam if elected.
Edited on Fri May-27-11 02:28 PM by Stuart G
He was a far better person than his opponent. Nixon.

I worked for him in 1968. Given a week or two more, they say he would have won. History would have been far differnt,and I believe far better, if he had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Even during the campaign, he said he'd stop the bombing of the North.
The linked article is a valuable reminder of his many contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC