Just what is Fox trying to say?
The New York Times won't respond to Fox’s accusations re Robert Boynton’s Magazine piece last week, but I will. Fox accuses the Times of "taking orders from" a George Soros-funded Web site," and describes Soros as "a left-wing billionaire currency speculator who funds many liberal efforts."
This is a particularly nasty and malicious bit of false innuendo. First off, while the Center for American Progress did give Robert Greenwald $80,000 to support “Outfoxed” (which was less than MoveOn.org) it had no say whatever over its editorial content and did not see a single frame until it was completed. It obviously had nothing whatever to do with Boyton’s magazine story. So Fox is just lying right there.
Second, the “Web site”—which is of course, a think-tank (where I am a Senior Fellow)- is funded by Soros, but he is far from its most significant funder. That would be the Sandlers of Northern California. So why is Fox picking on Soros? I don’t know for sure, but we do know that Sean Hannity, Tony Blankley and Bill O’Reilly have proven part of a nasty disinformation campaign to slander Soros with anti-Semitic codewords and images, and attack his religious beliefs on Fox and elsewhere. We note here the term “left-wing billionaire currency speculator” which can be read in some benighted circles as another way of saying “filthy, greedy, wealthy Jewish troublemaker.” For shame.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3449870/