Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blue Dog Dems Endorse Amendment That Would Double Unemployment, Gut Social Safety Net

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 06:40 PM
Original message
Blue Dog Dems Endorse Amendment That Would Double Unemployment, Gut Social Safety Net
Link: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/11/16/370172/blue-dog-democrats-endorse-balanced-budget-amendment-that-would-double-unemployment-gut-social-safety-net/

By Travis Waldron @ThinkProgress.org

Congressional Republicans are still trying to persuade Americans that they are focused on job creation, but each time they propose another piece of legislation, it is exposed as a gimmick that will do little, if anything, to create jobs. Such was the case with their anti-regulatory policies, their attempts to repeal health care reform, and virtually every other policy proposal they have brought forth.

Next up in that line, unfortunately, is a rehashed form of a radical Balanced Budget Amendment, a plan that according to recent analyses would actually cost America 15 million jobs. But thanks to the conservative wing of the Democratic Party, the Republicans won’t be alone in their chase for a radical budget amendment that could help push the country back into the throes of recession.

Despite the fact that House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) said yesterday he would encourage his party to vote against the radical plan, Blue Dog Democrats endorsed the amendment on a press call today, Politico’s Marin Cogan reported on Twitter. ThinkProgress confirmed that endorsement with a spokesperson for Rep. Mike Ross (D-AR), the Blue Dog Coalition’s co-chair for communications. According to the Hill, Ross said on the call that Blue Dogs favored such an amendment “before balanced budget amendments were cool”:

“We were advancing a balanced budget amendment when balanced budget amendments weren’t cool,” a co-chairman of the coalition, Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), told reporters on a conference call.

“If any Blue Dog does not vote for it, I’d have to question how much they’re a Blue Dog,” Matheson said.

<...>

More at link



Blue Dogs, DLC Dems, New Dems....what the hell ever happened to just plain ol' "Democrats"...the ones that actually advocated for the people?
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. good gawd this fucking Tabor Crap is going to kill us all
can anyone take a look at Californis and think that a balanced budget amendment can ever work?

PEOPLE DIE OVER THIS SHIT!! We are not corporations which must profit. States and governments exist to serve the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is what's left of the party after Koch Bros. DLC controlled it for more than 20 years -- !!!
I'm sure Obama will be admonishing them shortly -- !!!


:evilgrin:


We have to pay a lot more attention to Third Way control over the party now --

Jonathan Cowan, Pres. Third Way says their stance/policy is the "base of the party

is to be ginored." Further that "populism or populist discussions and debate are

the equivalent of Karl Rove propaganda of extremism."



:nuke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. The blue dogs are more interested in being re-elected than
working with the more progressive Democrats. About the best thing you can say about them is they don't vote for Boehner and McConnell for leadership positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Can't really even say that. Recall that 19 of these "Blue Dogs"
voted against Pelosi for speaker, casting their ballots instead for fellow Blue Dog Heath Shuler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC