Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Care Needed in Fixing CIA(Bush ignored budget control - Congress shouldn't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:57 AM
Original message
Care Needed in Fixing CIA(Bush ignored budget control - Congress shouldn't
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-intel3aug03.story
EDITORIAL
Care Needed in Fixing CIA

August 3, 2004

For months, the Homeland Security Department has been issuing dire but vague warnings of a possible terrorist attack. The new, specific terror alert about buildings in Washington, D.C., New York City and New Jersey suggests that maybe the CIA's work, including in Pakistan, where it helped guide a raid on an Al Qaeda cell last week, is starting to improve.

It's an important sign at a moment when President Bush is endorsing the bipartisan 9/11 commission's call for a new national intelligence director and a national counter-terrorism center. Imagination, energy and smarts count for more in fighting terrorists than shuffling bureaucratic boxes. The CIA would be far better off recruiting better analysts with language skills and area expertise than undergoing sweeping institutional change that undercuts its own director.

But just as he bowed to calls for a Homeland Security Department before the fall 2002 midterm elections, Bush is calculating that he can't afford to be seen as lackadaisical about the fight against terrorism. The result is that he's sending Congress an amorphous proposal for overhauling the 1947 National Security Act.

Bush has essentially punted the tough questions, leaving it to Congress to decide how to create a national intelligence director and counter-terrorism center. It's easy enough to draw up these positions on paper. But how would the director wield authority over the Pentagon, which has steadily expanded its intelligence operations? And how much budgetary authority would a director wield? <snip>

Congress is filled with fancy bills for reforming intelligence. But it shouldn't rush to create an election-year proposal that dodges hard questions surrounding intelligence fixes. Of course, Bush may be crazy like a fox in issuing such a sketchy plan. He gets credit for action, but nothing real is likely to happen before Nov. 2.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC