Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Clinton inherited prosperity; bequeathed recession."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 05:09 AM
Original message
"Clinton inherited prosperity; bequeathed recession."
A Record of Recovery
By GEORGE P. SCHULTZ

Published: August 4, 2004

Over the course of last week, we heard a lot from the Democrats about their record of economic achievement. So let's take the advice of a Democrat of yesteryear, Al Smith, the former governor of New York. His trademark phrase was, "Let's look at the record."

These charts show the rate of change in real gross domestic product and in employment from 1990 to last June. The shaded areas show recessions. The vertical lines show when President Bill Clinton took office and when he left. Because the economy has momentum, it's useful to look carefully at the trends in evidence at the time of presidential transitions. When you look at the record, a quick summary is this: President Clinton inherited prosperity; President Clinton bequeathed recession.


more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/04/opinion/04shultz.html?th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. "there's lies, damned lies, and then there's statistics."
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bhaisahab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. bartcop will have something to say abt this...
... look out for his page tomorrow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Orwell LIVES!
This kind of nonsense is hilarious, imo. This is the same kind of nonsense that Bush is using to try to convince people that the economy is good. Do they honestly think that people don't know when they are or aren't employed? Bwah!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Bushes are no longer members of a political party. They are a CULT
Edited on Wed Aug-04-04 05:25 AM by flordehinojos
The Bushes are no longer members of a political party. They are a CULT all their own on whose behalf people are willing to lie, distort facts, spin truths, override the constitution. They really are a malaise that needs to be given some strong antibiotics (as inKerry votes) that will send them back home ASAP.:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. And Bush I was responsible for the budget surplus?
Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. what a crock of shit
more of the up is down spiel - don't believe what you see, believe the lies that are spewing from the spinmeisters' lips.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. hmmm... well, that's not really true
while the dot com bubble would have burst (and was bursting) when Clinton left office, what we've gone through would not have been nearly as dramatic.

As for when Clinton took office... well, the first Bush had turned the economy into shite anyway (that's where "it's the economy, stupid" came from, and 'stupid' was Bush I).

So here is another right wing hack blaming Clinton for Bush's bad leadership.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realthing Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well...
To be honest things were going down by 1997. Yeah Bush screwed us all cause Gore is a god and everything but economy speaking we got lucky in the 1990's. Too many backers that didn't know what they were backing in the first place. As much as it hurts me to say it the economy is back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What evidence can you provide to support your views?
In particular, why do you think "things were going down by 1997"? And what in the world do you mean by "Gore is a god"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. ..freeper alert!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katym Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. maybe you missed the democratic in democraticunderground.com...
Or maybe you're like the other rethuglicans...your head is so far up your ass you dont even know who Bill Clinton is, besides a scapegoat for everything Bush has done wrong.
I suppose *when* Kerry gets elected, you'll blame our new prosperity on bush???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Greenspan helped to create the recession by raising the interest rates...
four or five times in 2000. If he didn't have so much integrity, I would say he did it to help Bush*. (sarcasm)

Oh wait! Now the economists are suggesting it wasn't much of a recession at all. Are they flip-flopping?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC