Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Softy for the CIA (Goss loves the CIA not wisely but too well

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 10:07 AM
Original message
A Softy for the CIA (Goss loves the CIA not wisely but too well

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-cia11aug11.story
EDITORIAL
A Softy for the CIA (Goss loves the CIA not wisely but too well

August 11, 2004

Congressional Democrats complain that Rep. Porter J. Goss, whom President Bush nominated Tuesday to head the CIA, isn't a good choice because he's been sniping at presidential candidate John F. Kerry. They're wrong. The chief problem with Goss, a Florida Republican, isn't that he's too partisan. It's that Goss has been a patsy for the agency he's now supposed to rebuild.

Goss has glittering credentials. The Yale-graduate-turned-CIA-operative amassed considerable experience in covert operations during the 1960s. But the nostalgic haze through which he views the days of the good old boys at the CIA distorted his work with the agency in Congress. As head of the House Intelligence Committee, Goss was responsible for congressional oversight of the CIA before Sept. 11, or, more precisely, the lack of it. He's been a tenacious defender of the CIA's perks and privileges and shielded it from any real scrutiny.

Sure, in the committee's June report on intelligence failures, Goss fired off a thunderous and unexpected blast against his old buddy, George J. Tenet, for failing to reform the CIA and tolerating slipshod analyses. But where was Goss before it became politically convenient to backstab Tenet? Why wasn't he grilling CIA officials about their Iraq assessments and lack of spies in the ranks of Al Qaeda?

Goss' passivity suits Bush perfectly. He won't challenge the president. He won't fire any senior staff. Most likely, he won't do much of anything. Goss, who has lobbied furiously for the job, including carrying water for the administration by attacking Kerry, would be happy simply to get the post.<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. This was another good editorial today from Times
Thanks Mr. Kinsley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC