In the age of U.S. preemption, the ability to strike the United States and its interests becomes the only deterrent against becoming another Iraq, as the $10 billion already spent on the untested antimissile program is just for symbolism, as we prepare to spend the "needed" $1 trillion.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-arkin15aug15.story MILITARY
'Star Wars':($1 T)Pie in the Sky(makes no sense financially or strategically)
The missile defense being set up makes no sense financially or strategically.
By William M. Arkin
William M. Arkin is a military affairs analyst who writes regularly for Opinion. E-mail: warkin@igc.org.
August 15, 2004
SOUTH POMFRET, Vt. — This year, more than two decades after President Reagan delivered his "Star Wars" speech and initiated a crusade to protect America against missile attacks, the United States will finally deploy the first component of a national missile defense.
If ever there was a case of wasted defense spending, missile defense is it.
The idea of making the United States impervious to missile attack got its start in the years just before the Soviet Union began to totter. The end of the Cold War might have killed the idea but for an influential band of ideological true believers who kept it alive by reorienting the program toward the potential threat posed by such "rogue states" as North Korea, Iraq and Iran.
The events of Sept. 11, 2001, dealt what also could have been a mortal blow to the missile defense dream. Al Qaeda's attacks on New York and Washington led President Bush to change the fundamental paradigm of national security. No longer would the United States wait for terrorists or others to strike. Instead, it would act preemptively whenever a threat began to develop.
The United States would develop offensive capabilities to strike anywhere on the globe to counter the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. And the frontline of this active defense would be far "forward," meaning overseas. In other words, under the Bush Doctrine, the U.S. would intervene militarily long before any potentially hostile regime could develop missiles or other weapons capable of reaching American soil.
So it might seem a little strange that — on July 22 — the first 55-foot-long antimissile missile was placed in an underground silo in the foothills of an Alaskan range 107 miles southeast of Fairbanks. Seemingly stranger still, the Bush administration acted as if the U.S. had deployed something that was as workable, innocuous, consistent with its policy and necessary as air bags on automobiles.<snip>