Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Bush strategist praises Clinton (anything to bash Kerry)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 01:49 PM
Original message
Top Bush strategist praises Clinton (anything to bash Kerry)
big-time flip-flop for the Bush campaign:

http://progressivetrail.org/articles/040819Corn.shtml

<snip>

Of course, the GOPers didn’t fancy Harkin reminding folks that Cheney dodged the draft. In fact, the Bush campaign position now seems to be that draft-dodging is not at all inconsistent with being a fine leader. Last night on Hardball, Matthew Dowd, the chief strategist and pollster for the Bush-Cheney campaign, said, “I think it’s just outrageous that Tom Harkin, a surrogate for the Kerry campaign, would do it. Bill Clinton served the presidency with distinction without having served in Vietnam or in a war.”

<snip>

<But Bush said:>

“We have seen a steady erosion of American power and an unsteady exercise of American influence. Our military is low on parts, pay and morale. If called on by the commander-in-chief today, two entire divisions of the Army would have to report: Not ready for duty, sir. This administration had its moment. They had their chance. They have not led. We will….America’s armed forces need better equipment, better training, and better pay. We will give our military the means to keep the peace, and we will give it one thing more: a commander-in-chief who respects our men and women in uniform, and a commander-in-chief who earns their respect. “

<snip>

<and Cheney said:>

“For eight years, Clinton and Gore have extended our military commitments while depleting our military power. Rarely has so much been demanded of our armed forces, and so little given to them in return. George W. Bush and I are going to change that, too. I have seen our military at its finest, with the best equipment, the best training, and the best leadership. I’m proud of them. I have had the responsibility for their well-being. And I can promise them now, help is on the way. Soon, our men and women in uniform will once again have a commander in chief they can respect, one who understands their mission and restores their morale.”

But now, when the subject is national security and military matters, Dowd says Clinton served with distinction. Was he not paying attention in Philadelphia? Or is he willing to say anything that sounds good to score a political point–even if that entails praising the anti-Christ of the right?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, really? I thought Clinton was
a draft dodger, according to the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hilarious irony:
"Rarely has so much been demanded of our armed forces, and so little given to them in return. George W. Bush and I are going to change that, too."

Yeah, they demanded more, much much more, and cut the benefits. Instant change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC