Derrick Jackson: Democrats Play Jingoist Card

[Larkspur]

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0820-01.htm

<SNIP>
By saying he would still vote for the Iraq invasion, Kerry seems to endorse the loss of between 3,200 and 7,300 Iraqi civilians in the initial invasion, according to estimates by news agencies and think tanks. By saying he would still vote for the invasion, Kerry also accepts how Americans were numbed by the Bush administration not to care about Iraqi civilians, even as we claimed to liberate them.

The United States refused to make any civilian death counts even though it will say how many "insurgents" were killed. In an April press briefing, Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt was asked about images on Arab TV of American soldiers purportedly killing Iraqi children. Kimmitt's response was straight out of 1984. "My solution is quite simple: change the channel. Change the channel to a legitimate, authoritative, honest news station. The stations that are showing Americans intentionally killing women and children are not legitimate news sources. That is propaganda and that is lies. So you want a solution? Change the channel."

The US-propped-up Iraqi interim government did change the channel this month, shutting down the Baghdad office of Arab satellite television network Al Jazeera for 30 days. We have unnecessary carnage and censorship, and Kerry would still vote for this?

Things were going so badly in Iraq that Kerry came from big deficits in several major polls into a close race with Bush on who can better handle terrorism and Iraq. But very recent polls by Pew and Time show that Bush has stopped his free fall and is back up to 56 to 58 percent approval ratings on his handling of terrorism. That may foretell that Kerry's go-along-to-get-along, but I-can-do-it-better claim may already be at the end of its effective use.

Bush may be in trouble because he is emulating Nixon. But it is doubtful he will be beaten by John Lyndon Baines Kerry.
<SNIP>

[geek tragedy]

1. More red herrings than a fish farm.

This crap is against DU rules.

[Moderator]

2. Locking.

Pursuant to this rule:

{O}nce the Democratic party officially nominates its candidate for president, then the time for
fighting is over and the negative attacks against candidates must stop. The administrators of this website
do not wish for our message board to be used as a platform to attack and tear down the only progressive
on the planet with any hope of defeating George W. Bush. Constructive criticism and even outright disappointment with the candidate may be expressed, but partisan negative attacks will not be welcome.



This article crosses the line from constructive criticism to outright bashing of the nominee.