BY STEVEN THOMMA
Knight Ridder Newspapers
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/special_packages/election2004/9556231.htmRepublicans are going after John Kerry at their national convention with a vengeance. (snip) The blunt attack presents a stark contrast to the Democratic National Convention's ginger treatment of Bush. There, Kerry and his forces shied away from much direct criticism of the president, confident that nearly a year of describing him as a liar and a buffoon had already taken its toll. They were also fearful that more criticism might backfire, especially with swing voters who retain an affection for Bush despite misgivings about his policies.
...(snip)
Of course, both parties desperately want to win, but the very different approaches they took at their conventions raises the question of why Democrats didn't criticize Bush more directly, and why Republicans attacked Kerry head-on.
For the Democrats, there were three main reasons why Kerry aides tempered most criticisms of Bush. First, they thought Bush already was vulnerable, thanks to setbacks in Iraq, net job losses during his presidency and a still shaky economic recovery, particularly in such battleground states as Ohio and Michigan. (snip) Second, Bush remains personally popular with the American people. (snip) Finally, Kerry has a difficult time going after Bush where he's most vulnerable - the war in Iraq.
Republicans believe they have more leeway to blast Kerry. (snip) First, Kerry is at best unknown and at worst unliked. (snip) Second, Kerry left his public record open for Bush to define.
MORE...