By Michal Lemberger | RAW STORY CONTRIBUTOR
<snip>
We Americans also have the reputation of loving violence. And while it’s true that in big blockbusters, shoot-em-ups do solve most problems, in general, movies tend to reward only certain types of anger, and even then, they show that control is more important to attaining goals. Angelina Jolie can spray bullets all around her and come out on top; most other actors and characters can’t get away with it. They have to find other ways to vent their anger, be they ogre or political progressive.
It is boringly obvious to state that George W. Bush provokes anger in a good portion of the American public. His policies, his smugness, his sense of entitlement all come together in a potent mix of awfulness to elicit true revulsion.
(Incidentally, it is my extreme dislike for Bush that finally made me realize how so many Republicans and conservatives could hate Clinton with the passion that they did. It never made sense to me that a president should elicit that level of dislike. I could not wrap my mind around the idea that anyone would invest so much attention and emotion in an elected official. Disagree with his priorities, sure. Think he’s a slimeball, even. But hate? Well, thanks to W., I now understand it all too well.)
So we hate him. But what are willing to do about it? Bake sales for democracy? Great. Protests at the Republican National Convention? Also good. But what about playing hardball?
During the Democratic National Convention, Republicans put out two anti-Kerry videos to combat his “I’m John Kerry and I’m reporting for duty” moment. And let’s not forget about the oxymoronically named “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” media blitz. It would be nice to say that these things had no effect, that voters saw through the lies and smear tactics. But they didn’t, and Kerry’s numbers fell.
Democrats must understand that there is no such thing as being above the fray in politics. We’d all like the political system to be more civil, not to depend upon character-assassination and negative advertising. But that ‘s not the way of the world, at least not right now.
The Republicans have understood the political landscape very well over the last couple of decades. That’s because they created it: the word “liberal,” which undergirds our entire system (we’re all liberals, even W. and Co., since we take things like a democratic system that affords certain rights for granted, even as we argue about the extent of those rights) has been dragged through the mud, Democratic nominees are painted as wimps or liars or “slick.” As if there’s anything other than a slick politician. All this in the service of a greater goal: winning.
But Democrats want to have it both ways. They want to suggest the wrongs of the other guy, without coming out and taking a bite out of his well-padded derriere. This will not do. There is as little place in campaigning for nuance (as Kerry is finding out) as this for civility.
<snip, more>
http://www.rawstory.com/exclusives/contributors/time_dems_played_hardball_902.htm