Bush Speech Shows U.S. Conservatism Has a New Playbook

[papau]

"The fight for the next half-century will be over how to prevent taxes and spending from being swollen to European dimensions by government-retirement programs. And politically, that puts conservatives back to where they were before quarterback Kemp abandoned the football field three decades ago — playing defense." "President Bush's speech offered a rough start at giving conservatives a new offense. 'Government,' he argued, 'should help people improve their lives, not try to run their lives.' The new goal is no longer to make government smaller. Rather, the goal is to change the nature of government so it empowers citizens, provides them more choices and gives them more control over their finances and their lives." "This is a very big idea — even if it sounded like a laundry list of policy retreads. At its most ambitious, it would be a redefinition of capitalism that would, as the president said, 'extend the frontiers of freedom.'"

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,,SB109450925228810613,00.html?mod=todays%5Ffree%5Ffeature


POLITICAL CAPITAL
By ALAN MURRAY


Bush Speech Shows U.S. Conservatism Has a New Playbook
September 7, 2004; Page A4

I spent Thursday evening on the floor of the Republican convention, and I can report with confidence that the delegates didn't once break into a chant of "OWN-ER-SHIP." They were happy, of course. They would have been happy if George W. Bush had read from the phone book. But when he started discussing his "ownership society," some looked as if they thought he was reading from the phone book.

Still, despite dazed delegates and dissing pundits, the first half of President Bush's speech was probably the most enduring part. It may not help Mr. Bush win the election of 2004, which, it is now clear, is going to be relentlessly focused on national security. But the ideas mark an important effort to redefine conservatism in this country. And whether President Bush wins re-election or not, they signal a new era in national politics.

Former congressman Jack Kemp, who was sitting proudly in the vice president's box on Thursday night, symbolizes the old era. He convinced the Republican Party in 1978 to embrace across-the-board tax cuts. In every national election over the subsequent quarter-century, the party proudly waved the tax-cut banner. Candidates didn't need to think long or hard about what economic-policy proposals to put at the center of their campaigns. The answer was always the same: cut taxes.

But those days are over. Not for decades will a Republican candidate be able to run on an agenda of broad-based tax cuts. In the short term, budget deficits make that position untenable. In the longer term, the retirement of the baby boomers will do the same.

The fight for the next half-century will be over how to prevent taxes and spending from being swollen to European dimensions by government-retirement programs. And politically, that puts conservatives back to where they were before quarterback Kemp abandoned the football field three decades ago -- playing defense.<snip>

[Veggie Meathead]

1. The sheer number of cons that Bush pulls on the American people

is getting to be mindboggling.Firts, it was his tax cuts that transferred all the wealth to the upper classes;in return we were supposed to get all these jobs that have failed to materialize except in China and India.Now the carnival barker has a new act "Ownership Society". This is going to help him drive a nail through FDR's coffin by gutting social security.He has, of course, taken care of Medicare by bringing in the drug companies to offer "discounts" on prescription drugs.All of these program cuts will release moneys that will let him fight his wars on one pretext or another so he can play Winston Churchill II.

Reminds me of Mark Twain's saying:" You can never go broke underestimating the intelleigence of the average American".Or should I say "misunderestimating" in honor of Dubya?

[BillZBubb]

2. Well, duh, Mr. Murray!

They've taken the tax cut insanity to it's inevitable disastrous conclusion. When the country is hemorrhaging red ink, you can't go to the well any more.

They need a new playbook. The only thing left for them is to fight "big government".