Here is the context for child and pubbie

[nadinbrzezinski]

http://www.glennbeck.com/page2/index.shtml]]


The story is fake. The same guy has made up the same story before. Seems it happens to him all the time:


Serial Republican Victim complains for the THIRD straight presidential election of being assaulted and has his family assist.

Unbelievable.

Here is today's newspaper story:



A Republican family attended the rally to show support for the Bush-Cheney ticket. Phil Parlock, a Barboursville resident and strong Republican, said his family was accosted by some Kerry supporters.

"We do it peacefully and quietly to show respect. And, we don’t want to get kicked out of anything," Parlock said.

After standing on the tarmac with the Kerry supporters, Parklock and three of his children moved down to the airport road near a parking lot exit.

With Parlock were sons Phil II, 21, and Alex, 11, and daughter Sophia, 3.

Parlock said a Kerry supporter yanked a Bush-Cheney sign out of Sophia’s hands, making her cry. As they stood along the road later, someone threw the ripped-up remains of the sign at them as they passed.


Problem is, as pointed out by some (Rezmutt) at D.U. is he has done this before.

Charleston (WV) Daily Mail, August 27, 1996, Page 3C


Phil Parlock's experience was less calm.

The Huntington man said he was knocked to the ground by a Clinton supporter when he tried to display a sign that read "Remember Vince Foster," the deputy White House counsel who committed suicide in a Washington, D.C., park. His death has become the subject of much debate among Clinton opponents.

"It must have been a strict Democrat who did this," Parlock said, feeling the red abrasions on his face. "Everyone with the exception of him was real peaceful about our protest."

Parlock said some of the crowd tried to make other anti-Clinton demonstrators feel unwelcome. He estimated that about 150 Dole supporters attended the rally, but their signs couldn't be seen for most of the rally.


Charleston (WV) Daily Mail, October 28, 2000, pg. 1A:


Phil Parlock didn't expect to need all 12 of the Bush-Cheney signs he and his son Louis smuggled in their socks and pockets into the rally for Vice President Al Gore.

But each time they raised a sign, someone would grab it out of their hands, the two Huntington residents said. And sometimes it got physical.

"I expected some people to take our signs," said Louis, 12. "But I did not expect people to practically attack us."

The two said they didn't go to the Friday morning rally to start trouble.

"I came to support Bush and try to change some people's minds," Louis said.


Now here is the picture of Parlock with his three-year old daughter, who he enlisted as his assistant (father of the year no doubt).




Notice closely the young man wearing the union shirt and holding a piece of the sign?

Now here is a picture of the very productive Parlock family:



What are the odds, this allegedly angry sign-ripper in the union shirt, holding the fragments of a ripped Bush sign is either the guy in the grey sweater or the blue shirt?

So was Parlock having one of his sons portray a union stooge?

This guy is a serial disrupter with pretty much the same story every time.

Remember this when the Cornerites and Little Green Snot Bubbles spout off and try to make this a big story...especially in the wake of the known abuse protestors get at the regular "Triumph of the Will" functions that comprise a Bush Campaign appearance.



If you choose to engage in this story, use this as AMMO to put it in the context of the methodology used by the RW.

Child crying becuase big bad union man took her sign needs to be killed and replaced with... is Padock a provocateour that takes children to rallies?

See message matters.

[Warpy]

1. I think a writing campaign to that paper may be in order:

"SUCKERS!"

[nadinbrzezinski]

2. Yep, just did

[ClintonTyree]

3. So Liplock..............................

is a serial asshole! Who'd a thunk it?

Seriously, someone should call child protective services on this idiot. Using his children as bait to provoke others to confrontation is a serious matter. These events have all been premeditated, choreographed provocations and he's putting his children right in the middle of it. WHAT A MAN!!

Good old Republican family values at work right there. This man doesn't deserve to have children, he should be examined by a clinical Psychiatrist and locked up.

[nadinbrzezinski]

4. Yuo got it partially right

the child was not in danger at any moment, the big bad union man was teh brother, you think the brother was going to truly endanger his sister?

What they did is create AN EFFECTIVE IMMAGE

The story has to die unless people are willing to put it in the correct context,

Change the message, THE CHILD WAS NEVER IN DANGER... dad is an agent provocateour and what he engaged in is CLASSIC.

Now send an email to the paper and tell them how you feel, I just did

I even connected dots for them with family photo and AP photo

[ClintonTyree]

5. But one day...................

it COULD happen for real. All you have to do is piss of the wrong person at the wrong time with this bullshit and all hell could break lose. This is NOT a very intelligent family we're dealing with here.

[nadinbrzezinski]

6. Actually they are brilliant

read any good handbook on how to mobilize the masses

Ironic that those were written by Trotsky (many neo cons were trostkytes at one point) Mao and Che Guevara.

Soem of these techniques are also detaield in spec ops manuals you can get at the surprlus store

Problem is nobody has connected the dots until now, that is why they have been so effective.

Wrong person attacks them, for real, they will charge the attacker with assault... again classic... they know what they are doing... and now we have to expose them for being agent provocateours

[nadinbrzezinski]

7. kick

think how these agent provocateours have used the media and us