Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Decoding the National Polls(Ruy Teixeira)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 12:52 PM
Original message
Decoding the National Polls(Ruy Teixeira)


Decoding the National Polls
By Ruy Teixeira, The Center for American Progress and The Century Foundation
Posted on September 23, 2004, Printed on September 23, 2004
http://www.alternet.org/story/19971/
From the Center for American Progress and The Century Foundation:


In this edition of Public Opinion Watch:

(covering polls and related articles from the weeks of September 13-19, 2004)

Decoding the Gallup and New York Times Polls
Persuadable Voters Still Not Persuaded

Decoding the Gallup and New York Times Polls

Here are Bush's leads in the three national polls released before Gallup's current poll (no registered voter data available for Democracy Corps and Harris, only likely voter data; Pew and Harris matchups include Nader):

Democracy Corps, September 12-14 LVs: +1
Pew Research Center, September 11-14 RVs: tied
Harris Interactive: September 9-13 LVs: -1

Looks like a tie ball game, right? But according to the Gallup poll conducted September 13-15 and released September 17, Bush is up... by thirteen points??

Let's just say I'm just a wee bit skeptical of this one. First, Gallup's poll only includes one day (September 15) that the three other polls do not cover, so it can't be Gallup's survey dates that explain the big Bush lead.

Second, this thirteen-point lead is an LV figure and, as I've repeatedly emphasized, Gallup's LV screening procedure produces completely untrustworthy measures of voter sentiment this far in advance of the election. Here is a summary of the case against Gallup's LV data:


http://www.alternet.org/election04/19971/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't underdstand why they would ask if you know where your
polling location is to determine a likely voter. Nearly every polling site in my county changed this year because of HAVA. I have no idea where my polling location is and I never have. I have voted by Advance Ballot for years now.

Shouldn't they look at voter turnout in previous elections? I am a perfect voter (vote in every primary/general/city election) so it would reason that I will vote in Nov. It shouldn't matter how interested I am now. If I haven't missed a ballot in 10 years, why would I now? My answers to some simple questions about concern/level of interest/polling locations seems irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC