Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top 10 Secrets They Don't Want You to Know About the Debates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 09:06 PM
Original message
Top 10 Secrets They Don't Want You to Know About the Debates
Top 10 Secrets They Don't Want You to Know About the Debates
by Connie Rice (Not Condilezza)

(10.) They aren't debates!

(9.) The debates were hijacked from the truly independent League of Women Voters in 1986.

8.) The "independent and non-partisan" Commission on Presidential Debates is neither independent nor non-partisan.

(7.) The secretly negotiated debate contract bars Kerry and Bush from any and all other debates for the entire campaign.

(6.) The debate contract effectively excludes all other serious presidential candidates from participating in the debates.

(5.) All members of the studio audience must be certified as "soft" supporters of Bush and Kerry, under selection procedures they approve

(4.) These "soft" audience members must "observe in silence."

(3.) The "extended discussion" portion of the debate cannot exceed 30 seconds.

(2.) Important issues are locked out by the CPD debate rules and party control.

(1.) Fortune 100 corporations are the main funders of the CPD-sponsored debates, and the CPD's co-chairs are corporate lobbyists.

The CPD is run by Frank Fahrenkopf, a pharmaceutical industry lobbyist, and Paul Kirk, a top gambling lobbyist," Rice says. "And the biggest muliti-national corporations write the checks that fund the CPD -- Phillip Morris, Anheuser-Busch and dozens more. The audience may have to be silent and motionless, but the corporate sponsors can have banners, beer tents, Budweiser girls handing out pamphlets protesting beer taxes -- a corporate-sponsored circus to go along with the Kabuki Debates. Could we get a more fitting description of our democracy?"

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4052162

"We need a new criminal law for reckless endangerment of democracy."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
michaelwb Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed - with rant
The debate process has been a joke since the League of Women Voters stopped running them.

Of course, what's the point of watching these debates. No matter what actually happens the media will spin in the way they want until the meme becomes truth.

Oh, like the 2000 debates - which the media quickly started spin the meme that Bush won and now it seems to be the collective memory when in fact those watching, and the polls right after the debate, said Gore won.

If the media spins things the way they want and they no longer even do basic fact checking of politicians - why not just have the different parties press secretaries and PR people handle the news and eliminate the middlemen.

Grrrrr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's stuff like this that makes me mad as hell.
The Democrats and the Republicans have conspired to ruin this country. A pox on both their houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MISSDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's the best thing that we have so make the most of it.
Listen and form your own opinion and don't listen to the "analysis" afterwards if you will let them influence what you think happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC