Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

War Crimes in Fallujah: Alexander Cockburn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:43 PM
Original message
War Crimes in Fallujah: Alexander Cockburn
http://www.counterpunch.org/

"Let Them Drink Sand!"

<snip>If there is anything that should fuel the outrage of the antiwar movement, it is surely the destruction of Fallujah and the war crimes being inflicted by US commanders on its civilian population, who are now being denied the most basic and essential source of life, water.

This is not the first time that US forces have cut water supplies, something explicitly forbidden under Article 14 of the second protocol of the Geneva Conventions, which reads as follows:

"Starvation of civilians as a method of combat is prohibited. It is therefore prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless for that purpose, objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population such as food-stuffs, agricultural areas for the production of food-stuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies and irrigation works." <snip>

<snip>Here at CounterPunch we are in receipt of a compelling dossier of the denial of water to Iraqi civilians, assembled by Cambridge Solidarity with Iraq (CASI)], whose briefing may also be studied at http://www.casi.org.uk/>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just remember, the UN gave the US immunity for all this.
And for anything else they do until next summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. no, they did not....
Edited on Sat Nov-13-04 09:55 PM by mike_c
The U.S. withdrew its U.N. motion for renewal of immunity for war crimes last summer in the face of overwhelming security council opposition.

Bremer included an executive order in his last minute amendments of Iraqi law barring the puppet Iraqi government from prosecuting U.S. forces for war crimes. But there is no longer U.N. immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. From the original report
~~~~~~~~

Evidence for the denial of water

Tall Afar

On 19 September 2004, the Washington Post reported that US forces ‘had turned
off’ water supplies to Tall Afar ‘for at least three days’. Turkish television reported
a statement from the Iraqi Turkoman Front that ‘Tall Afar is completely surrounded.
Entries and exits are banned. The water shortage is very serious’. Al-Manar television
in Lebanon interviewed an aid worker who stated that ‘the main problem facing the
people of Tall Afar and adjacent areas is shortage of water’. Relief workers reported a
shortage of clean wateriv. Moreover, the Washington Post reports that the US
army failed to offer water to those fleeing Tall Afar, including children and
pregnant women.


Samarra

‘Water and electricity cut off’ during the assault on Samarra on Friday 1
October 2004, according to Knight Ridder Newspapersvi and the Independent.
The Washington Post explicitly blames ‘U.S. forces’ for this. Iraqi TV station Al-
Sharqiyah reported that technical teams were working to ‘restore the power and
water supply and repair the sewage networks in Samarra’. Al Jazeera interviewed an
aid worker who confirmed that ‘the city is experiencing a crisis in which power and
water are cut off’, as well as the commander of the Samarra Police, who reported
that ‘there is no electricity and no water’.

Fallujah

On 16 October the Washington Post reported that:
‘Electricity and water were cut off to the city just as a fresh wave of strikes
began Thursday night, an action that U.S. forces also took at the start of assaults on
Najaf and Samarra.
Residents of Fallujah have told the UN’s Integrated Regional Information
Networks that ‘they had no food or clean water and did not have time to store
enough to hold out through the impending battle. The water shortage has
been confirmed by other civilians fleeing Fallujah, Fadhil Badrani, a BBC
journalist in Falluja, confirmed on 8 November that ‘the water supply has been cut
off’.
In light of the shortage of water and other supplies, the Red Cross has attempted
to deliver water to Fallujah. However the US has refused to allow shipments of
water into the Fallujah until it has taken control of the city.
Other cases
There have been allegations that the water supply was cut off during the assault
on Najaf in August 2004, and during the invasion of Basra in 2003. We have not
investigated these claims.

Justifications for the denial of water

Some military analysts have attempted to justify the denial of water on tactical or
humanitarian grounds. Ian Kemp, editor of military journal ‘Jane’s Defense
Weekly’, argues that
‘The longer the city is sealed off with the insurgents inside, the more
difficult it is going to be for them. Eventually, their supplies of food and water are
going to dwindle’.
Barak Salmoni, assistant professor in National Security Affairs at the U.S. Naval
Postgraduate School in Monterey, told the San Francisco Chronicle that civilians
would probably be encouraged to leave Fallujah ‘by cutting off water and other
supplies‘. These arguments are deeply flawed on legal, humanitarian and
political grounds. The majority of the population of Fallujah fled before the
American attack. Those who have not already fled Fallujah are forced to remain,
since roads out of the city have been blocked, including by British troops.
Not only are those remaining unable to leave, but they are likely to consist
largely of those too old, weak, or ill to flee – precisely the groups which will
be most severely affected by a shortage of water.


~~~~~~~~

http://www.casi.org.uk/briefing/041110denialofwater.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. No matter what you think of the war
just remember, we're not doing ourselves any favors by crying warcrimes. It kind of looks unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That is one of the stupidest statements I've ever heard!
You can't be serious, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He forgot which BB he was on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'll say whatever I want thankyou.
Crying, is that like whining? That one of those codewords you've picked up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. nice, another "good German...."
Shhh, don't mention the war crimes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I wonder if the Germans said this about the Nazi's


"we're not doing ourselves any favors by crying warcrimes"

"It kind of looks unpatriotic."

No.... Dissent is Patriotic!!!!

Dissent is Patriotic!!!

Dissent against War Crimes is the least you can do as part of the Human Species.

DISSENT IS PATRIOTIC!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Patriotism means telling the truth
The truth is that Bush and his aides lied in order to drum up support for an invasion that they knew had nothing to do with banned biochemical weapons or terrorist plots. The truth, which they knew well, is that Saddam was no immediate threat to his weakest neighbor. The truth is that Iraq is not a liberation, it is colonial piracy.

That makes the invasion of Iraq a war crime on its face. Shall we go on and discuss the circumvention of conventions prohibiting the use of torture in Bush's off shore gulags? Yes, we need to tell that truth, too.

The truth is that the Bush administration is the nastiest collection of war criminals in over half a century. I would like to see them answer for their crimes. That would cleanse the name of America from the muck that these criminals have smeared on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdtroit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. What???? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Those are our guys over there
fighting for their lives, following orders and hoping to survive the traps laid for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. yeah, they're "our guys." but they're also destroying a country
that didn't attack us, they've committed atrocities in abu ghraib, and they're doing it all in the service of halliburton.

sorry, but i'm no longer sure which side i'm rooting for. because the country i thought was mine became one i don't recognize.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I'm against the war too
I believe in patriotic dissent but I have a hard time blaming those at the bottom when the top is wholly responsible.

It's hard to watch, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. War Crimes are Authorized by Those at the Top
And that is who we are angry about. It is those at the top who have decided that The Geneva Convention is "quaint" and does not apply in the "war on terror." They are the ones who disrespect the soldiers on the ground by disavowing international agreements and laws that were created to protect ALL soldiers (including our own) and civilians from torture and being slowly murdered by deliberate dehydration and other crimes against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Absolutely,
not the misused soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Cockburn is preaching to a people, most of whom don't give a diddledy-fuck
about such piffles, or so it would seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC