Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did things really start to go wrong for * when the "leak" got stopped?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
waywest Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:40 AM
Original message
Did things really start to go wrong for * when the "leak" got stopped?
Coincidence? Just seems to me that when the pukes couldn't cheat as neatly, the newly level playing field reeeeally sucked for bushco.
BTW, I'm ready for the exposee about Frist's computer. And Cheney's Plamegate story. And the * testimony at 9-11 panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush's* high water mark was his aircraft carrier landing.
Since that day, the cards have been working against him. His SOTU address was the beginning of the end, because it was not a resounding victory speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackcat77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. That was the day he jumped the shark
That stunt was SO over the top that people took a second look, not only at that moment -- and especially the "Mission Accomplished" -- but also all the other stuff. So many times he's boasted and postured and strutted around and a few weeks or months later, it's all turned to ashes for him.

Now, people are finding it harder and harder to believe him on anything. He says the economy is the "best it's been in 20 years," but people aren't blind. He says we're victorious in Iraq, but people can see the carnage every day on tv. He declares orange alerts that come to nothing and are criticized by people all over the world.

Once these thing start down the slippery slope, it's very difficult to stop. Bush is in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Possibly...
When the CIA agents made their request for an investigation to the DOJ, and some of them appeared on Nightline and the Lehrer Report, that wa the first time I recall the mainstream media paying attention to any sort of serious criticism of this maladministration...

And certainly the gates have opened since!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. When it got exposed, Chimps approval ratings slid fast,
until the media decided to squash the issue - Plame leak issue. I must have sent over 1000 e-mails to all the media whores on this deliberate act of treason denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Might have been David Kay.
But the SOTU didn't help. Plus, in quick succession came the "Meet the Press" business, plus the pounding from the Democrats, increasingly emboldened - especially by the vigor, prominence (for quite a while), and outspoken, unapologetic anger of the Howard Dean campaign - and increasingly covered by the media (which means THEIR message was the one getting out more often), and now AWOL. With a steady sprinkling of bad economic news, bad job numbers, bad outsourcing numbers, and bad casualty numbers from Iraq.

Mainly, I think the Plame affair started it all, last summer, because before that, it was just this constant, candy-coated sunbath gently fluttering down upon him with reporters mainly wondering which of his toes he wanted to have massaged that day. I think it REALLY started back then, although it's progressed in an extremely uneven manner, lurching along in fits and starts ever since.

The high-water mark was 9/11. You couldn't even get his critics to say "boo" then. And whoever dared to was shouted down and demonized as unpatriotic and pro-Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2004Donkeys Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, it was the War On Iraq
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC