CNN discussing CLarke's book, coming up next, supposedly: 2:40 EST

[buycitgo]

MSNBC said same thing awhile back, but Skkkotty's conference took care of that

former Clinton and Bush officials will be discussing it, according to the promo.

they said it's up next, but you know how that goes

[buycitgo]

1. meawhile, what about THIS?

the 911citizenswatch.com press conference specifically stated that they want to know the contents of a July 5, 2001 briefing that CLarke had with the WH, during which a "spectacular attack" warning was given.

has anyone heard about that?

[buycitgo]

2. BARBARA COMSTOCK is on! Boiler room woman!

defending the admin!

unbelievable!

[buycitgo]

4. says he's irresponsible and wrong

says Condi Rice is briliant!

how could he attack her?

too funny

[Nite Owl]

9. If Condi is so brilliant and so right

why won't she testify under oath? Hmmm. Wish someone would bring that up.

[buycitgo]

11. this, of course, is key to the entire fiasco

why on earth are they so completely UNWILLING to have even the most basic questions answered?

instead of a sunshine process, they bring only darkness

where in the FUCK is the outrage in the media over this?

isn't this the story of the century?

huh?

what HAPPENED prior to and AFTER 911?

we all know that, had Gore been allowed to take office, and had this happened on his watch (based on lots of evidence, I don't think it would), he'd already been impeached, tried, and HUNG!

[sadiesworld]

3. Also, Clark on Clarke @ 4p.m. on Faux. Oh, CNN starting.

[buycitgo]

6. what exactly did Clarke say about Rice not knowing about alQaeda?

did he say Condi didn't know who they were, or did he say she ACTED like she didn't know it?

HUGE distinction, which the host buys into?

now host is bringing up personal attacks.....Comstock, master of personal attacks, says they AREN't

says Rice asked for plan of action.....oh yeah?

WHERE is this request?

[Catherine Vincent]

5. hahaha!! the CNN anchor had to cut the repub woman off

Her mouth had the runs. Speaking but saying nothing.

[PROGRESSIVE1]

7. CNN actually cut off a Rethug!

Is this so?

[sadiesworld]

8. CNN pod: "(Clarke) statement stupid on its face"...

Why do I continue to expect anything but whoring from CNN?

[buycitgo]

10. yep.......that was amazing

Comstock brings up Center for American Progress as being funded by Soros, the Beers/Clarke connection

dem guy laughs off the "vast progressive conspiracy"

he also mentioned Ashcroft CUTTING the antiterrorism budget, during which BC constantly interrupted him, saying it wasn't true

isn't TRUE, counselor, that on September 10, that a request from the FBI for more money on counterterrorism was refused by Ashcroft?

did I get that right?


and it's too bad that, EVERY time she appears, that the dem opposite doesn't mention her MOST EGREGIOS tenure has head of the infamous Boiler Room, which the media KNEW about, but REFUSED to cover til AFTER the selection process.

[buycitgo]

12. they're playing 60 minutes tape now

Suzanne Malveaux carries WH water again, highlighting their criticisms of Clarke, without counter