Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi wouldn't listen..Bush wouldn't listen, Rummy wouldn't listen,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:29 PM
Original message
Condi wouldn't listen..Bush wouldn't listen, Rummy wouldn't listen,
Congress wouldn't listen.. THAT'S why Clarke is so pissed.. That's why he decided to leave..That's why he's spilling his guts..

He is our modern Howard Beale.. He sounded all the alarms, and yet, no one listened...and now after the fact, they still cannot see that he was right...

I think they pushed him into the cyber terrorism angle to "shut him up and make him go away"






http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/8/16803.html

US Congress whips up 'cyber menace' again
By: Kevin Poulsen
Posted: 09/02/2001 at 20:08 GMT

snip.........


Saxton and Chambliss call for federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to conduct a new study of cyberterrorists, defined as computer-savvy terrorist groups determined to crack American computer networks and sabotage critical infrastructures like banking and finance, energy production and distribution, transportation, and national defence. If passed, the resolution would not put new laws on the books, but would establish a largely symbolic "sense of Congress" that cyberterrorists are real, and that new laws are needed to punish them.

But belief that terrorists are turning to hacking is not universally held, even among relatively hawkish insiders. Speaking at a security conference last year, then-White House counter-terrorism Czar Richard Clarke said he believed that foreign governments could inflict grave damage on US infrastructures electronically, but that terrorist groups still prefer bombs to modems.

"I don't know what a 'cyberterrorist' is," Clarke said. "We have not found a terrorist group engaged in computer attacks on the United States. We haven't even found one preparing for computer attacks on the United States." The legislation comes amid renewed interest in hi-tech terrorism, sparked by a USA Today report Tuesday that mid-East extremist Osama bin Laden uses e-mail and encryption in planning terrorist attacks.

The preamble of the resolution also supports continued funding for the Clinton administration's cyber security programs, including the FBI's National Infrastructure Protection Centre (NIPC), and the Commerce Department's Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office, and it endorses Clinton's 2000 "National Plan for Information Systems Protection."

An identical resolution stalled in committee last year.

© 2001 SecurityFocus.com, all rights reserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. That sounds like a variation on the three monkeys...
...speak no/see no/hear no logic:7 B-) :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Iraq is why he is so pissed.
He was going to be a team player and do as much as he could within the government until they invaded Iraq and diverted resources from the real war on terrorism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3.  Paul O'Neill say Bush and his cabinent were like a blind man
Edited on Fri Mar-26-04 12:22 AM by billbuckhead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. What pissed him off, is that they still wouldn't listen AFTER 9/11
I think that's when Clarke smelled the rat. AFTER 9/11 and they STILL were more interested in hitting Iraq than al Queda. That opened Clarke's eyes for good.

This is a very convincing argument to repubs/independents. I mean really - WTF? 200 people just died in Spain because BushCO was busy pursuing their 1991 get-Saddam strategy instead of defeating al Queda and getting bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC