OK... We Need To Get On Jane Harman's Ass... NOW !!!

[WillyT]

<snip>

GOP lawmakers take on Clarke

Clarke’s book and the interviews he has given this week to promote it have enraged Republicans, which has launched a furious assault on his credibility. A variety of administration officials, from Vice President Dick Cheney on down, denounced him as a disgruntled political opportunist intent on salvaging his reputation and selling the book. The administration took the extraordinary step of issuing a long, point-by-point written rebuttal of the claims made in the book.

Key Republicans in Congress joined the campaign Friday, seeking to declassify testimony Clarke gave in July 2002 before a meeting of the the House and Senate intelligence committees. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said the goal was to determine whether Clarke lied under oath, either then or this week.

Frist told reporters that he personally had no knowledge that there were any discrepancies between Clarke’s two appearances, but he said, “Until you have him under oath both times, you don’t know.”

A Republican aide told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity that the request came from House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., and Rep. Porter Goss, R-Ill, chairman of the House intelligence committee.

<snip>

From middle of this article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4601195/

Man, this is gonna get REALLY ugly!!!

Battle station folks!

:kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick::kick:

[Name removed]

1. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[WoodrowFan]

2. ???

and why do you not think he is credible? Because Faux says so??

[dae]

9. I'm sure he questions the crediblity of the Bushistas.

[Name removed]

16. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[WillyT]

3. Um... He's Probably The #1 Terror Expert In The World ???

And welcome. Where've ya been since the 18th???

:shrug:

[Guy Whitey Corngood]

4. See yaaa!

[GregW]

5. Look! Up in the sky!

It's a bird! It's a plane! It's a tombstone!

[WoodrowFan]

8. not yet

He hasn't said anything tombstonable (tombstonish?). I'm just curious if he has a reason that isn't a repuk talking point...

[thebigidea]

6. the credibility of being hired and rehired by Presidents each of us like

though perhaps we'd rank the Presidents differently, eh?

[arcane1]

7. agreed, he is far less credible than Bush, Rummy, Condi

:eyes:

at least HE was willing to take the oath. Why not Condi???

[Frances]

11. Exactly

If they can take the extraordinary step of declassifying Clarke's testimony, why can't we hear from Condi under oath?

And while we're at it, why can't we know who in the White House leaked Valerie Plame's name?

And why can't we know who Cheney talked with about energy policy?

And why can't we know who in the White House kept Medicare figures from us?

[LibertyorDeath]

15. balaam clark has 30 years of service the majority of it to 3 republican

administrations he is an absolute expert in counter terrorism. He voted for Bush in 2000

So go learn to think for Yourself then come back.

THINK FOR YOURSELF try it u just might learn to like it.

[onecitizen]

17. Buh-bye nt

nt

[Qutzupalotl]

10. Hmmm...if you spoke to them twice,

once under oath, and once not...which time would you make darn sure to tell the truth? Maybe, just maybe, the time that carries the penalty of perjury?

Not saying there are discrepancies, but come on. Of course his sworn testimony is true. They're just upset because it makes Bush look bad.

Note that Frist has no knowledge of any discrepancies. That says a lot, since these guys are all on morning "fax blast" lists for their talking points. They got nuttin'. This is desperation and damage control.

[buycitgo]

12. really!!!!

she's been BEYOND pathetic


somewhere between Lieberman and ZMiller

just a DINO tool

GET RID OF HER

NOW!

Robert Wexler, for starters

[WillyT]

14. Well... This Is Her Moment... She Either Rises To The Occassion, Or...

:shrug:

[rucky]

13. Hastert doesn't know what's in the 2002 testimony

i doubt there's any changes - other than the tone.

[WillyT]

18. So... About Jane Harmon's Ass, LOL !!!

I gotta run for, discuss amongst yoselfs.

:loveya:

[Dookus]

19. I'm confused...

Jane Harman isn't mentioned in the article.

[WillyT]

20. True, But She Is Porter Goss's Dem Opposite On The House Intel Comm.

She needs to stand up to the former CIA operative and his rePublican thugs!!!

IMHO

:grr: