|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:08 PM Original message |
WHY did Bush/Cheney go on vacation? | Clarke: Gov't on alert July & Aug 01 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Even after vacation was done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. A few more links, thanks to ParanoidPat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. Agreed, this question should be front and center. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broadslidin (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. Mr. Rove's Propaganda Machine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. I want to see bush asked that DIRECTLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I wonder if CLARKE knows the answer to this question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oddman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. Excellent Post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 01:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Answer: Bush was NOT on vacation. Bush was IN HIDING from al Queda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 06:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
38. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. & we need to ask WHY the admin went to Iraq instead of finishing al Queda! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. Once again .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. You're kidding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 03:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. No jest here, Hun .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. the 9/11 families should do a public push to get Dick n' Dork to testify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. George Bush Jr.: I don't testify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. They need to keep hammering away regardless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adriennui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 11:36 AM Response to Reply #15 |
31. if president clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
16. Stephanie ?.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 03:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Hersh wrote that the NSC was put at the service of the Energy Task Force |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Well Steph ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 09:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Here's the New Yorker article about the NSC and Cheney's energy panel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Insider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. curiouser and curiouser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:18 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Well, there was the pipeline across Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
20. I vote it's because Bush is a lazy slob. Cheney may be another story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 07:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. bush may have gone along with it because he is a lazy slob |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
22. Decisive Bu$h anti-terrorist strategy responding to Aug. 6, 2001 PDB: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 03:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I can't even laugh at that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. "Nearly a laugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-28-04 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
26. Sure looks suspicious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 05:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Bunnypants went down the rabbit hole for the month of August 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 04:38 AM Response to Original message |
28. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack from Charlotte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
29. Rice's statement: "We were at battle stations...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. They were busy talking about stem cell research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushknew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
33. Excellent point Steph, it should be a commercial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 05:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Yes! Pix of Bush in his plastic glasses clearing BRUSH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushknew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 06:25 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. LOL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 06:30 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I want them under oath to answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushknew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 06:41 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Yeah, they are suppose to be the party of É |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. Dear Richard Clarke: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushknew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. hee hee, I love it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. CLEARING BRUSH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
42. pfft... he went on another MONTH VACATION even when we are at WAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. I think he did that to keep up appearances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. probably didn't want to be recorded in the WH plott'n like NIXON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:34 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Nice pix! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:56 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. thnx |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 11:03 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. They came back because Bush's vacation was so long it was raising eyebrows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushknew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-30-04 12:46 AM Response to Reply #42 |
53. Man, I would have loved to have heard the argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oddman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
48. This has to be kept in the public eye! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:49 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Yes, but I think they took the threats VERY seriously. For THEMSELVES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oddman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-29-04 10:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Great point . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC