Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC:~"65% say opinion of W not changed by Clarke testimoney..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:17 AM
Original message
MSNBC:~"65% say opinion of W not changed by Clarke testimoney..."
Loste quote shrunk to fit subject line. The story on the Newsweek poll is below.

MSNBC reported that yesterday. They said that 65% of those who responded have not changed their opinion of W due to the Richard Clarke testimoney and coverage. Of course 17% say their opinion is MORE negative and 10% say it is MORE positive.

At first I thought, "Wow W is actually weathering this storm" and then it hit me.......65% said their opinion hadn't changed which means if their opinion was negative before it still is and actually is MORE likely to be more negative. Notice also that 8% didn't respond in any way.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4614818/

According to the latest NEWSWEEK poll, the percentage of voters who say they approve of the way the president has handled terrorism and homeland security has slid to 57 percent, down from a high of 70 percent two months ago.

Still, the president’s overall approval rating remains steady at 49 percent and Bush remains neck and neck with presumptive Democratic Party nominee Senator John Kerry.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. 35% is a high number
for opinion change about the Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Noitcie also that W is "holding steady at 49%"
:eyes:

Yes 35% is high and add in that, based on the rest of the poll the missing 8% could go anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Yes, exactly - how dumb do they think we are?
%35 of people changed their opinion on shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. yeah, I didn't know
how to answer that question. Of course my opinion hasn't changed, it has just been galvanized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. If 49% approve of W overall
that means 51% disapprove and 2/3 of them haven't changed that. Of the other 1/3 there is a 3/5 (roughly) chance that their opinion is more negative.

There are all kinds of figures in there and I notice that I can't find a pie chart illustrating it clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Media trying to spin it as "majority support" with the 65% number
However, as you pointed out, it means nothing of the kind.

If 35% changed their opinion, and only 10% have their heads even further up Bush's ass, he's taking a serious tumble.

I only hope it translates to lots of dem votes (or lots of repukes staying home) in November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. My opinion of * hasn't changed one bit...

I still think he's every bit the bumbling, unfocused, lying, simpering little tool that I always thought he was.

Put me down for that 65% I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Peter Werbe talked about this last night
Same conclusions.

The show can be heard here:

http://www.WhiteRoseSociety.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. If you know how to better slant the question, please get in touch
with them. Their bushbot calumny is SOOOOOO OBVIOUS.

Of course I haven't changed my opinion regarding Bush because of Clarke's testimoney. He was lower than a slug before the testimony OMHO and he still is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Check out the actual questioning of "favoribility" question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, but we need to be moving people on this issue
Obviously, the hard-core and delusional people who get their "facts" from AM Hate Radio and the Fox "News" Network aren't going to be swayed by this. Neither are people with IQs in teh single digits, are those whose judgement is seriously impaired by drugs 24 hours a day.

But somewhere in the middle, this needs to start to unravel Bush's support and get him into the 40s, and keep him there.

I don't think his support will ever go below 40 percent. There are just too many "round heads" in his coalation of the stupid who are never going to believe anything they hear outside of their little Fox/AM world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. My opinion hasn't changed
I don't think I could detest him any more than I already did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, I noticed that poll/headline was really spun for bush, too.
The 65% are people whose minds are already made up about Bush, positive or negative.

Given his solid 30% for, and then a solid 35% against, and what we in fact have are more people being swayed to view Bush more negatively than positively due to Clarke's testimony (almost twice as much).

It's all about changing the minds that haven't been made up yet, and if that 10-17% is an indicator, Bush has been hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gemlake Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Clarke's testimony should also help with
the media's portrayal of bush on 9/11 and defense. The media can't get away with treating the subject as a slam dunk for bush anymore. Just like the Presidential polls showing Kerry even or in front of bush--they may not predict the outcome of the election, but they help shape election coverage, by forcing the media to abandon their "popular president" "overwhelming support" mantra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. I couldn't have hated him more, so technically my opinion didn't change
It's a "poll" set up to spin an event
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. Clinton's approval *after* impeachment: 73 percent
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/20/impeachment.poll/

The media can whore all they want...the American people are not being fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. The most important thing
is that the trust factor of the bu$h supporters has been eroding. The undecided voter - the most important element to this race - is now becoming uneasy with the thought of bu$h as President. Hell, we'll always think of bu$h as an abomination - but the undecided voter is now viewing bu$h with a healthy amount of skepticism. Also, I was one of the ten percent who NEVER thought bu$h was doing a good job - how did his approval rating get up to 90% after 9/11??????? Why are people's ideology so easily swayed?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Welcome to DU boreDem and Oddman
if I haven't before :hi::hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well, Underpants, there are many in this country
who will still have a favorable reaction to the president, even if an a bomb was dropped on Dallas itself. No matter what happens, Bush has his hard core constituency that won't back down with their support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Oh I know 30-35%
MAybe 40% are set in their support and the same number are set in their opposition.

I've always said that IMHO W's reall suport number is 47% as polls in summer 2000 said that 47% said they would never vote for Gore due to Clinton's penis and that is the number W ended up getting in the election--about 47%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Yes, it all boils down to Clinton's penis
Still getting e-mail jokes on this from hard (no pun intended) core Republicans. Never mind he's been out of office over three years. That's all they can hold on to (boy, I'm getting Freudian).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Maybe you should ask them
IS Clinton's penis the only thing you can hold on to?

Why can't you let go of Clinton's penis?

Is it so hard that you can't let go of Clinton's penis?

IS it too hard to let go of?

They's LOVE that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swinney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Uninformed is America.
I am shamed by how little the overwhelming majority of my lifetime friends know nothing. I mean nothing about domestic or world affairs.

Most would have voted for Hitler.

Hitler said over and over "God is with me".

That is all they need.

Many have been to college and are successful. Most are well off. Some are millionaires.

They simply do not read books. They watch tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. My opinion of Bush hasn't changed one bit...
It is hard to get below zero respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Of course, it hasn't changed my opinion of the moron.
I still despise him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. 17 percent--that's 18.7 million voters who like bush less than they did.
Just think, if only 1 or 2 percent of those 18.7 million voters switch from Chimp to Kerry because of Clarke, it could easily make all the difference in the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. A Really Stupid Way To Ask This Question
The question should have been asked if the revelations changed their opinion of Li'l Georgie negatively. Then a simple yes/no would have been revealing. This is badly structured poll just due to the inherent weakness of the question.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. It was left wide open to be spun
Like I said at first I was a bit surprised that 65% would have not been influenced one way or another and then I thought about the question that was asked. I don't recall the woman's name (very sharp black woman Sunday afternoon) and I know she is just reading it but they message that most got out of it probably would be that W has a 65% approval rating or that the Clarke testimony STRENGTHENED W's position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV1Ltimm Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. no change here -- is still think he's a dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. I argee, my opinion's still the same....
He's STILL an ASS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC