Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, We Got It! They Didn't Have The SPECIFICS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:57 PM
Original message
OK, We Got It! They Didn't Have The SPECIFICS!
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 08:58 PM by Beetwasher
But isn't it sort of the point that they should have TRIED TO FIND OUT WHAT THE SPECIFICS WERE?????

Nooooo! Not according to Rice. According to Rice, Preventing 9/11 WOULD HAVE BEEN SWATTING AT FLIES!!! They were sick of that. THEIR plan was to NOT TO STOP 9/11, but to RE-FORM THE WORLD IN THEIR IMAGE! It just wasn't quite ready yet, if only they had more time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. But ...
that isn't Condi's job. After all, she's just the National Security Advisor! :mad: :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Her Response: My SUBORDINATES Didn't Ask Me To Do Anything!!!
"Responding to Ben-Veniste, Rice acknowledged that Clarke had told her that al-Qaida had "sleeper cells" inside the Untied States. But, she added, "There was no recommendation that we do anything" about them. She gave the same answer when former Navy Secretary John Lehman, a Republican and outspoken Bush defender restated the question about sleeper cells. There was, Rice said, "no recommendation of what to do about it."

--snip--

Here Rice revealed, if unwittingly, the roots—or at least some roots—of failure. Why did she need a recommendation to do something? Couldn't she make recommendations herself? Wasn't that her job? Given the huge spike of traffic about a possible attack (several officials have used the phrase "hair on fire" to describe the demeanor of those issuing the warnings), should she have been satisfied with the lack of any sign that the FBI wasn't tracking down the cells? Shouldn't she have asked for positive evidence that it was tracking them down?

Former Democratic Rep. Tim Roemer posed the question directly: Wasn't it your responsibility to make sure that the word went down the chain, that orders were followed up by action?

Just as the Bush administration has declined to admit any mistakes, Condi Rice declined to take any responsibility. No, she answered, the FBI had that responsibility. Crisis management? That was Dick Clarke's job. " I needed to do anything," she said, "I would have been asked to do it. I was not asked to do it."

--snip--

From this article:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2098499

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. So, she admits Bush never asked her to do anything about terrorism
Well, ain't that just dandy. The Prez. gets briefed daily about terrorism and what's he do? Does he ask his NSA to do something? NO, According to Condi. Poor Condi, no one asked, or told her, her to do one damn thing. Left out in the cold, eh, Condi? They didn't let you play, did they?

It was all just a game, eh? Play a little game and then go on break. Take a vacation. Make a speech or two. But knuckle down and do something about protecting America? Hah! Nobody told her too!

Adults in charge?!? More like playing a game of "Hide behind the bush"
Fucking incredible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Could you believe that?
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 10:02 AM by MrBenchley
The National Security Chief is told there are terrorist sleeper cells IN THE US, and she sits with her thumb up her ass FOR EIGHT FUCKING MONTHS because nobody told her what to do? And she can't remember if she mentioned it to the "War pResident" or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Dude from Indiana was on Olbermann
and said something like 'No, they didn't have ..." we're going to fly planes into building x on this date and by the way, wear a read tie" but they had enough information by August 6th to know SOMETHING needed to be done...'

BINGO. They had as much information as they NEEDED to do SOMETHING, and they did NOTHING = LIHOP. On purpose or from apathy, it still = LIHOP.

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LIHOP or LIHTI
Let it Happen Through Incompetence.

That's their excuse. We were incompetent, oops! And we're not even sorry about it and no one is going to be held responsible, so there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's exactly right.
I've been hearing Bush make all these cluelessly rueful half-apologies in the media--"If I had *only* known they would fly planes into the two towers on 9/11, I would have prevented it!" Trying to sound all noble for saying something stupid that everyone would say (and who knows, he may be lying on that point, actually). The point is, he knew all kinds of sh*t and on the day it happened, almost nothing was in place to prevent it, and even existing ordinary defenses didn't come into play. I wonder if anybody on the Commission asked anybody about the lack of fighter craft in the air on 9/11...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dagaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the response we'll hear
What we needed was a Patriot Act BEFORE 911 but can you imagine Ashcroft asking for one his first few months in office? What are the chances that Congress would have given the WH what they needed back in Feb?

What would have been the public will for invading Afghanistan?

The state of the public was just so different pre 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toska Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Manage the crisis
And remember that Condi said that she kept Dick Clarke on to "manage the crisis".

When Bush came into power what "crisis" did they need managing? I'm not convinced about LIHOP or MIHOP but it seemed a wierd choice of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. To be fair
She may have been referring to after 9/11 - Clarke wanted to be transferred to working exclusively on cyberterrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah....I'm not at all surprised by any o'this....
.....it's exactly what I expected...more bullshit that keeps drawin' flies. :evilfrown:

:hi: :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Hey!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. WHAT THE HELL MORE DID THEY NEED??
The August 6th Presidential Daily Briefing was titled "Bin Laden determined to strike inside the U.S.".

Rice says she was told "Unbelievable news in coming weeks" and "Big event ... there will be a very, very, very, very big uproar."

She says, "Troubling, yes. But they don't tell us when; they don't tell us where; they don't tell us who; and they don't tell us how."

So, that makes it OKAY that you failed to act?! (LIHOP aside)

WHAT WOULD HAVE MADE IT IMPORTANT ENOUGH for crying out loud?

Condi, what did you need? The DATE, TIME AND FUCKING PHONE NUMBER? YOU are the National Security Advisor.

</rant>




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. They wanted the place, the day, the time and how it was going to be done.
Until they had all that information, there was nothing but supposition and nothing to do but what they were doing. Focusing outside the US.

PS/ Just hush up about the title to that PDB of Aug 6, 2001, it was only "historical information", no "specific" warning telling them what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Colonel Mustard, in the pantry, with a cricket bat"
sorry Condi, you only get those kind of "specifics" in the movies or in bad mystery novels.

Real criminal investigators (and 9/11 WAS a crime, don't forget) have to connect the dots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
homelandpunk Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. "plan was to NOT TO STOP 9/11, but to RE-FORM THE WORLD IN THEIR IMAGE"
You so nailed it. You nailed it. These are maniacs who are bored with petty governmental WORK. Little things are not important...it's the big stuff. Big, religous, apocalyptic things they get to be in charge of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Kick
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
18. Dear Evil-Doers;
We regret having to take this action, but your continued intransigence in this matter leaves us no other options. Beginning immediately, all members of the Axis of Evil, and supporting members, must adhere to the following requirements before launching attacks against the United States, its allies, or its corporations:

  1. We now require one week minimum advance notice of any terrorist attacks. This notification must include names, targets, and methods to be used.
  2. Any missles launched with the intent to inflict mass destruction and casualties must be outfitted with an appropriate homing beacon in the warhead.

Non-compliance with these new guidelines may result in military action against a country of our choosing, which may or may not have any connection to your activities. This will be your only warning.

Sincerely,

George W. Bush, President of the United States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. Like I've said, a certain lack of imagination and initiative. . .
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 10:50 AM by frankzappa
Sheeeesh, what DID she want - an engraved announcement???

But don't blame CondoPizza - she's a victim of social promotion, don't ya know ??

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC