Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the Jon Stewart Show presented a Strong Possibility of LIHOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:10 AM
Original message
the Jon Stewart Show presented a Strong Possibility of LIHOP
I watched the second rebroadcast of tonight's Stewart show, and it seemed like Stewart was so obviously disgusted with Rice, and the reaction on his face about the title of the August 6th PDB really was telling. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick for the god that Stewart is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. When he heard the title of the Aug. 6th PDA and said ...
"Are you f*cking kidding me? Are you f*cking kidding me??"

I was ROFLMAO because when I heard her say the title during her testimony, I reacted the same way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jon is such an intellectual dream.
Whenever I watch him, I begin to dream about what a Jon Stewart News Network would look like. Imagine that.. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm almost in love with Jon myself...
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. More of incompetent than LIHOP
but then, what's new?

And, yes, he had a great juxtaposition of Rice's testimony and the questions by the committee members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's on in L.A. now
and he IS incredible! I loved the Lucitania (?) line. This is one of his best shows ever. It's SO validating. Thank God for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. incompetence = LIHOP, if not MIHOP
incompetence is no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. I taped it for Hubby and watched it twice, his reaction was just so
dead-on...
HOW the fuck anyone can believe ANYTHING that this administration says is beyond me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I know----that was my reaction too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. He really hammered Rice.
More relentless than usual, IMO.

LIHOP :shrug: I thought Tweety was on the verge of LIHOP earlier myself. It may just be that once the facts are laid bare, Bushco's negligence looks so bizarre...we think LIHOP.

I run hot and cold on the L/MIHOP issue myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktranz Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. i have a sickness
I have the yern to throw up whenever I see Bush, Cheney, Rice, Powell, Ashcroft and that newly face bitch Karen Hughes is on TV. Should I sue them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
42. Hi ktranz!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
54. LOL! Sounds like grounds for a
class action suit. :bounce:

Welcome to DU

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. i think bush is in trouble
big trouble. as an adult you can`t hide behind the -"the other guy did`nt do anything why should i?" he doesn`t want to take responsibility for his failures and this time he can`t have his dad bail him out..
a case study of the bush family dynamics would be a worthy doctoral thesis,wouldn`t it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. all that and a soccer player at W&M College
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. soooo cuuuuuute....
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. My best friend's brother could have hung out with Jon Stewart...
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 05:18 AM by mouse7
...instead of the doper that talked him into dropping out of school and joining the Hare Krishnas with him.

They're the same age. They would have been at William and Mary at the same time. It's not that big a school. They would have had to have at least a passing acquaintance... well... Brad probably doesn't have many brain cells left anyway. He may not even remember he went to William and Mary by now.

Damn fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
36. My mom and his mom were friends
Her name is Marian Leibowitz and she's a very well-respected educational consultant. Used to work for the public schools, but for years now she's been travelling around giving seminars and workshops. Good lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. where did you dig that up from?

looks like one of my college buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
39. Google rocks
A simple search for Jon Stewart will yield this pic. I used to live within an hour of W&M at the time he went there, but I was just a sprout in junior high or so, and can't say we hung out, lol.

Stewart is the best anchor on television, but the "official" media would never admit it because of how shameful it would be for them to confess that the best news show out there is on a comedy station, presented in a comedic format. It was always the jesters who could get away with telling the truth about the king, which makes you realize things haven't changed all that much.

Plus, he gives Lewis Black a forum, and just for that I am grateful. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. Actually, Some 'Official Media" Does Give Stewart His Due
New York Times, Columbia Journalism Review and The Nation are three that come to mind right away. Hell, Edwards announced his candidacy on the Daily Show!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. those are real media
I was mocking MSNBC, Fox, CNN, et all, with the word 'official' in quotes.

I have that Nation article, but then, they are lefties so I expect them to love Jon like most of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5thGenDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. I was at Fort Monroe, not far from W & M, in 1974-76
I spent a little off-duty time around the William and Mary campus back then. Of course, if you're a history buff that whole part of Virginia is great.
John
There was a gas station across from the campus called "Middle Earth Sunoco." For some reason, that's the first thing I remember when I think of Williamsburg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. It was absolutely fantasic
What a guy! Showed her testimony for what it was. I was incensed at the talking heads and the kudos they were giving her today. I'm glad that nightline had on Richard Clarke. Interesting that she didn't even try to refute what Clarke had said. I think her 30 minute opening speech was absolutely detestable. A concerted waste of precious minutes she could be questioned, and not helpful to anybody. I thought she was terrible. I believe the kudos given to Bill Clinton were a reflection of how terrible she was. Imagine pugs giving kudos to Clinton!! Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. Somehow, the truth finds a channel
And for us right now, that is Jon Stewart.

http://www.wgoeshome.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinayellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. The only hope that TV can be a tool for
truth and goodness instead of lies and evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. the beginning of finding the truth about 9/11 lies in . . .
the question: Why were jets not launched to intercept the hijacked airliners until AFTER the Pentagon was hit? . . . the problem is that nobody is asking the question! . . . not the Commission, not senators or congresscritters, not the media, no one . . . given that this was such a complete breakdown of standard operating procedures -- a breakdown that happened only on 9/11 -- you'd think someone would be asking the fucking question! . . . in fact, you'd think everyone would be asking the fucking question! . . . but they're not . . .

beyond the obvious, one of the reasons this is such an interesting question is because it should be fairly easy to trace who was or was not given orders on that day . . . everyone from Rummy right down to base commanders and individual pilots should be interviewed to find out just what did and did not happen, and why bases all up and down the East Coast did not scramble that morning . . . somebody (maybe a lot of somebodys) knows the truth, but you can't get to the truth if you don't ask the fucking question! . . . to everyone who was involved, or should have been . . .

why this line of inquiry is not being vigorously pursued is beyond me . . . I can only conclude that everyone -- the Commission, the Congress, the media -- simply don't want the truth to come out . . . which means that it's probably pretty devastating stuff for BushCo . . . and which also demonstrates the degree to which all parties -- the Commission, the Congress, the media -- are in cahoots with one another in this conspiracy of silence . . .

you can't have a democracy if the basis of how people vote is nothing but lies . . . I fear for our democracy . . . or what's left of it . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Right ON, OneBlueSky!
Every damn time I hear somebody from the Regime say "there's nothing we could've done to stop the attacks," I scream at the TV:

You could have damn well sent the INTERCEPTORS, as Standard Operating Procedure dictates! Where the FUCK were the INTERCEPTORS??

Alas, it's beginning to come to light that SOP was changed around June of 2001. It looks now like Rummy had to give the order to scramble instead of it being automatic.

The question needs to be answered:

Where were the interceptors?

:grr:
dbt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. The answer to why NORAD did not respond 9-11
is in this in this link.

http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/cjcsd/cjcsi/3610_01a.pdf

Seems that Vice Admiral S.A. Fry issued this instruction on June 1, 2001 to change the military's response procedures to a civilian hijacking. The directive effectively restricts field commanders from any response to a hijacking unless the Secretary of Defense (Rumsfield) gives authorization to intercept the aircraft.

As we know, Rumsfield was in a hi-level meeting that morning in the Pentagon.

I am curious about why the directive CJCJI 3610-01A was issued to change the procedures already in place that seemed to work so well protecting the Sky. Another smoking gun, and this explains the lack of military response, plus if the process of how this directive came about, we may then have MIHOP.

This information on the directive was posted last week sometime in DU. You may want to search DU to pull the original post for more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
41. That still doesn't tell us why they weren't in the air for readiness to
intervene with deadly force, or more simplistically to get visual identification of who was in the cockpit. That is part of the reason the jets are sent up. Somebody also had to order them to stay down and also to fly at reduced speeds when the were finally airborne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. No, I didn't say they did not have authority for shoot-down
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 01:37 PM by JellyBean1
that was the poster below, I said they could not even take-off with-out Rumsfield authority.

Check out the other thread.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=10090


Edit to add other thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. Only the Pres
Only the pres can order a commercial airliner shot down - if I remember correctly. Bush couldn't order anything because he was reading to 2nd graders at when he needed to be on the horn with NORAD. The whole notion that Bush thought it was an accident is insulting to anyone with a brain's intelligence! Bull shit! I knew it wasn't an accident supposedly before Bush and I was simply watching CNN in the teachers' lounge. Bush's stories of what he knew that day so contradict each other that you can't believe a word he says. Let's see - he's the president of the most powerful nation in the world - I'm a fifth grade teacher. I was in the lounge making copies when CNN broke in with the story that a plane had crashed into the WTC. My first thought was - "Shit, that's a terrorist attack!" I immediately called my husband at work, and he had already heard about the attack. By the time the 2nd plane hit the 2nd tower, we already had about 50 parents in the office checking their kids out of school. You can't tell me that parents weren't showing up at the school Bush was at checking those kids out. By the time Bush acknowledges knowing that it was a terrorist attack, another two schools in my district had evacuated (because they are next door to the FCC HQ), about half my students had gone home, and we were under lockdown in the classroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. The Florida parents may have wanted to check
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 11:20 AM by FlaGranny
their kids out of school, but you can bet that not one of them was allowed within a mile of that school - our glorious president was there, Secret Service, and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellbound-liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. I believe this show will be rebroadcast on Friday at 10:00 a.m
if my TV Guide is correct. I'm looking forward to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bark Bark Bark Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. One Thing That Has Given Me Pause
...about Jon is that every time he's had a right-winger on, he's gone out of his way to declare that "anyone who says Bush is a puppet or a dummy or a figurehead, they automatically lose a lot of credibility."

I imagine he's quit saying that since the announcement that Dick Cheney will be bringing his ventriloquist act (featuring "Li'l Dubby The Whistle-Ass Wonder") to the 9/11 Commission. "Puppet" is too damn kind.

Stewart has probably gone with it to put the neocons at ease, so that they will more readily pack their shoes down their own throats. (And do they ever! It's too damn bad I missed Ann Coulter's appearance; that must have been jawdropping.)

But regardless of this, and as long as one takes anything Lewis Black declares with a grain of salt, "The Daily Show" is a delicious antidote to corporate media spincrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think he is pointing out that GWB has responsibility
for his actions and words. Some excuse GWB - "oh it is all Karl Rove, it is all Dick Cheney, etc etc" - So I think that is Stewart's point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. hey don't diss Lewis....
he's pretty funny...I loved his anti-carb diet diatribe...it was too funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Well, at least you're not eating bread!
I'm glad someone else remembered that rant! I was trying to tell everyone about it, to blank stares--alas.

"If you're shaped like an Apple or a Pear, EAT an Apple or a Pear..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bark Bark Bark Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #23
55. Carb Your Enthusiasm
I find Lewis Black funny, don't get me wrong, but ironically that same "anti-carb diet rant" really turned me off. Black's bit about the Atkins low-carb (not anti-carb) diet was full of so much outright disinformation that I can't help but suspect the folks at Wonder Bread gave him a little something beforehand. Or he doesn't care to know what he's screaming about.

I know Atkins works--beautifully--from personal experience. Two months of it gave me better results than I got from years of following the carb-choked Food Pyramid and running until I collapsed every day.

Enjoy Lewis Black's act, but don't base dietary (or any other) decisions on his word, any more than you'd match your politics to one of the cast of "Crank Yankers" or get a prostate exam from Colin Quinn. Like I said, take 'em all with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. Jon is just AWESOME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melv Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. kudos to the daily show
and jon stewart.

one question though, are they somehow contractually obligated to Carel with those terrible "Produce pete" pieces? Geez, with that plus the Jason "has this been washed" interview, the second half of the show was totally lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yeah, the First 10 Minutes
Was all that was worth seeing. I guess having one of the stars of "Valerie's Family" waxing intellectual about foot cleanliness at the health club just doesn't do it for me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
29. LIHOP, sorry but what does this mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. LIHOP means
Let It Happen On Purpose. Meaning a passive do nothing response to a known threat to allow an event (9-11) occure.

MIHOP is Make It Happen On Purpose. To take a active role, even if behind the scene, to have the event occure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Acronym for:
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 08:44 AM by JHB
Let
It
Happen
On
Purpose

Back in the 90's many of Bush's advisors (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc.) had argued for invading not only Iraq but other MiddleEastern countries to overthrow repressive regimes (and expected the "throwing flowers at our feet" treatment for doing so), but figured such a policy was out of political bounds barring "something like a new Pearl Harbor".

The political advantages reaped so heavily (and so shamelessly) by the Bushies from 9/11 leads a numbner of people to believe that they had planned something like that all along. Tha they ignored warnings of a major terrorist incident and Let It Happen On Purpose. They may have been caught off guard by the scale of what happened (or not: see MIHOP theories -- Made It Happen...), but they used it as planned to ram through the patriot act, suppress dissent, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Let It Happen On Purpose
LIHOP = Bush gang knew a terrorist attack on the US was going to happen (possibly not knowing the full extent of the plans) and decided to let the attack go ahead so they could capitalize on the resulting anti-Arab hysteria to invade Iraq and go forward with the neo-con/PNAC plans to build a global US controlled hegemony. The PNACers explain in one of their position papers that they thought another "Pearl Harbor" type event would be needed to motivate the US population into accepting their proposed plans for a worldwide "Pax Americana."

See this DU thread for a discussion on PNAC http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1069536


MIHOP = Make it Happen on Purpose. Bush gang and/or elements of US and allied intelligence agencies had an active hand in setting up 9/11 to happen and probably used Arab's as patsies to take the blame. Motivation again being to get the new Pearl Harbor they were looking for to motivate the populace into accepting the PNAC goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. My vote is LIHOP, then
Thanks, I guess I've been 'out of the loop' too long. I just put a new video card in and my son has been hitting the games hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
34. Keep checking the Comedy Central Web site for the video
if you haven't seen it. They should have it posted by this afternoon.
http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_shows/thedailyshowwithjonstewart/

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
37. Is there any way those of us who missed it can hear/see it?
I just checked his site and didn't see a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. oops, looks as if Rocknation just answered my question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
General Discontent Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
44. Best. Show. Ever.
Best. Show. Ever.


D Wolfman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. The state of American media
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 03:24 PM by Generator
today is that the "fake news" show has more truth in ten minutes than the hours of the rest. We are living in the age of irony perfected. I ADORE Jon Stewart. He keeps me sane. He does not give the BS a pass. His show is honestly the most devastating critique of the Bush regime times we have. Get everyone to see this show!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
47. why is Jon Stewart doing the mainstream media's JOB??
The only one actually analyzing what Rice had to say is Jon Stewart?

WTF???

He did it brilliantly and showed what a sham it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. the media's forgotten that their job is supposed to criticize the govt
or be the watchdog against the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. not necessarily criticize, but QUESTION and INVESTIGATE
and CONFIRM or not

Biggest story of this DECADE: the failure of the U.S. media.

Who's gonna report that? Just us I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. been going on for a LONG time
ever read George Seldes?

Mark Hertzgaard?

Fools for Scandal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
51. If I was a woman I'd want to marry Jon Stewart
Seriously, though, he is so f**king funny and his facial expressions are a comic talent. But to your point, he is all over this stuff and puts a clarity to it. I hope the young kids are watching him because I'm sick of hearing how Bush has the college vote which I don't believe, by the way.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Hey -- you could try
Did you see his interview with Howard Dean? I haven't laughed that hard in years.

Having asked Dean to explain his position on gay marriage, in the skit Stewart while listening to the reply drifts off into a fantasy as he considers the choices ahead of him -- "Dr and Mr Howard Dean? Mr and Dr Jon Stewart?"

The other part that had me howling was Stewart's continuous prompts to Dean to lower the level of his response to Stewart's audience, finally suggesting that maybe what he should do is just rattle his keys a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
58. If I owned a network...
like Jon Stewart, the clip *I* would play, over and over and over and over and over and over and over -- would be the one of Condi recalling the title of the August 6 2001 PDB -- "Osama is About To Attack The USA In A Big Big Way Real Real Soon."

Instead, the networks are playing over and over and over and over again Condi lying through the gap of her teeth the meaningless platitude, "There was no silver bullet."

Bullshit Condi -- if *I* was smart enough to figure out heavy shit was coming our way during 2001 *from just reading the frigging newspapers every day*, you, Dr Rice, National Security Advisor, have no frigging excuse to have missed this. Blaming others is not an option.

Although I was aware of the Aug 6 PDB in the days following Sept 11, I must admit that I was still bowled over to actually hear her say it's title in public. Imagine what it felt like if you'd lost someone in the rubble of the WTC that day....

Condi -- you better hope I have no influence on the sentence you will eventually receive, because I want to see you flogged in public before you are thrown in jail. 3000 lashes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC