Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Commander Will Not Take Blame For Unrest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:09 PM
Original message
US Commander Will Not Take Blame For Unrest
US commander will not take blame for unrest
By David Rennie in Washington
(Filed: 09/04/2004)


America's top commander in Iraq has warned Washington that he will not be "the fall guy" if violence in the country worsens, it emerged yesterday, as word leaked out that US generals are "outraged" by their lack of soldiers.

America's generals consider current troop strengths of 130,000 in Iraq inadequate, reported the columnist Robert Novak, a doyen of the old-school Right in Washington.


Iraqi militants fire on US marines during clashes in Fallujah
Gen John Abizaid, commander of Central Command, told his political masters earlier this week that he would ask for reinforcements if requested by the generals under him. His words overrode months of public assurances from the defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, and other civilian chiefs that more troops are not necessary.

As violence flared across the Sunni triangle and the Shia-dominated south of Iraq on Wednesday, Mr Rumsfeld indicated that troop numbers would be bolstered at least temporarily, by leaving in place units that had been earmarked to return home as part of troop rotation, while still sending replacements.

But officers who will not speak out in public let it be known that major reinforcements might be impossible to find. US forces are so overstretched in Iraq and Afghanistan that "there are simply no large units available and suitable for assignment", Novak wrote in his column in The Washington Post.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/04/09/wirq109.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/04/09/ixnewstop.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=45445


I am starting to get really frightened about this. Those of you with better knowledge of how the military works, please help with something.
My son (my son, my son, my only child) is in the Air Force. He has some kind of desk job working on computer programing. If things get desperate enough, and I believe things will get very desperate, what are the chances he could be sent over there to carry a gun? Please don't laugh at me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is a very high probability
That if things continue as they are now, escalation will soon become inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is why they need to bring back the draft.
Or leave Iraq all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. US Commanders taking a page
from the thug playbook. "Not my fault"

Clintons penis must be somewhere near Falluja.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Odd
I read it differently. I think he's saying, "Bush, Rummy and the rest of 'em are screwing us hardcore."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I read it the way you read it
I was going for the sick laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. ah
I get it now. The Clenis. Sorry.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. they won`t send him
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 01:45 PM by rchsod
they will take the poor and middle class kids first. he`s to expensive to carry a gun... you should get a hold of mari333
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. He will not be reclassed infantry any time soon.
The USAF needs their admin folks. They will call up people from the Reserves before they reclass active-duty folks. JMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC