Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Al la Stir fry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:28 AM
Original message
Bush Al la Stir fry
Edited on Sun Apr-11-04 11:31 AM by FreakinDJ
Bush Al la Stir fry

I certainly think he is toast in the coming election and will give my reasons and suggestions as I go on. The key to all of it is public pressure and timely release of issues we have long been following here at DU. We all have our media list and well as E-mail list of lawmakers. My suggestion is simple, that we do not let off pressure until we kick these Bums out of office.

911

The commission is not finished and the fat lady has not sung yet. Yes we know the final results are going to be muddied and offer a few twigs of hope for the repukes to spin, but the testimony of Tenet and Muller has yet come. There is going to be some pretty undeniable fireworks there and the basic premise it was during Bush’s watch.

Plame outing

As this investigation gains steam many Americans are totally unaware or have yet to grasp the context of the matter. Shooting the messenger and diminishing our capabilities to thwart Weapons of Mass Destruction while actively promoting the Weapons of Mass Destruction Lie for preemptive strikes just don’t mix. It’s a hard on for even a Freeper to swallow.
Then there is the LAW and the fact that by UCMJ this is an executable offence. While we know this came out of the OSP we need also to remind every one of how many Ex-felon Iran Contra folks are on Chimpy’s payroll

Certainly we have enough to keep them on the defense all the way to November and prove to even the dumbest sound byte freeper Credibility is Key and these guys have NONE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did you mean to say
that it's a hard ONE for even a freeper to swallow?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes but I didn't bother to correct it
should I ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are the testimonies this week going to be public?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baronessniki Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. If you really want to know how bad the Iraqi situation is just think back
to what the Republicans were saying when Clinton sent troops to Bosnia and Kosovo. Not think what they would be saying if Clinton were in office right now under the same circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Welcome aboard!
Believe me, the DU has commented plenty about the obvious hyprocrisy of Republicans. We know very well how they helped terrorism by making the lies of the RW smear machine baseless grounds for a political impeachment. While Clinton was doing his best to deal with terrorism, the Republicans were sending the FBI on a wild goose chase trying to find gold-diggers in Arkansas who would help their Inquisition along.

Republicans wailed mightily about "wag the dog" and "you can support the troops without supporting the President". In the end, Clinton was totally vindicated, but the Republicans helped AQ by kneecapping the last popularly elected President.....and now the spineless cowards are helping this unelected fraud and his criminal administration stay unaccountable for their actions by not applying the same standards they held Bill Clinton to.

If you can impeach a sitting President for lying about sex, what do you do to a pResident that fails to react to warnings of attack and lies about the perpetrators of the attack? Impeachment is too good for this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC