Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blitzer brings up the "alleged abuses" of Iraqis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 11:23 AM
Original message
Blitzer brings up the "alleged abuses" of Iraqis
Just what I would expect from an alleged reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. On an...
alleged news channel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wolf is legally obligated to say that
Until the perpetrators are convicted of a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Right
but it doesn't take a giant brain to know it's not only more than alleged, but also not an isolated case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. I would agree
except they don't apply the same standard when referring to the crimes of Saddam.

They never say he allegedly gased his own people.

Nor that he allegedly had rape rooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. The difference is
Saddam is not a US citizen.

These soldiers are. While all the evidence points to the fact that they are guilty as sin, until they are convicted, a journalist has to refer to their crimes as allegations as a CYA against a potential suit for Libel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. That is a difference
but it is not relevent to the proper use of the word. We have words that only apply to US citizens? :crazy:

alleged (adj.) Represented as existing or as being as described but not so proved; supposed.

Wolfie never said, "Saddam possesses alleged weapons". But that would have been accurate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are we looking at "alleged" pictures?.....A stupid thing for Wolfie to say
Edited on Sun May-02-04 11:30 AM by glarius
If no pictures had been shown, but were only rumoured to be taken, then he could say "alleged."....I allege you are pretty dumb, Wolf!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sorry to tell you that is the U.S. way to include the word alleged.
Edited on Sun May-02-04 12:11 PM by higher class
Not doing it is equal to demanding a posse be formed or gathering the wood for the fire at the stake or finding the rope for a hanging - it is in our legal process to let the courts decide and accusing someone without the process is unamerican and not using the word is something we should hold dearly. Another opposite of the legal process is the picture you get when you think of human beings rotting in chicken cages on a naval base on an island in the Caribbean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Alleged may be appropriate to describe actions of individuals
Edited on Sun May-02-04 12:17 PM by bigtree
But who can look at those pictures and say that abuses didn't occur?

Or, do we suppose that the Iraqis performed these acts against themselves without coercion?

These acts are alleged no more. Now for the accountability. Now for the justice that our laws provide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. The way I'm defending the use of the word applies to people....
obviously, the photos, if untouched, are equivalent to a dead body - they are evidence.

The people in the photos, the photographer(s), the 14 or so other people and EVERYONE involved in CIA and Military intelligence whether as employees or contractors and EVERY higher-up in the line of command is alleged to have done it, condoned it, authorized it, promoted it, is alleged to have done it.

That said, I have such a cynical opinion of our leaders based on their history, that I don't use the words alleged even if their crimes don't get to go to court. They have a track record and they are politicians and they are supposed to represent us - so I will accuse them - just as I support Joe Wilson accusing them this morning.

A reporter, however, uses the word alleged in regards to the charges against a PERSON. The responsibility of news reporting is essential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Blitzer used the word alleged twice in reference to the abuses
As in: "the alleged abuses" with no attribution to anyone. It seems that these alleged reporters have no problem ascribing the worst of motivations and actions when it suits them. Editorializing has replaced reporting, but there is always a reticence, whenever they speak of anything that might implicate the actions of this administration, to call a crime a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. No one in the military has disputed the authenticity of the pictures
so far as I have heard....They seem to be accepted as authentic...Therefore the abuse depicted was not alleged....IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wolf asks, "Was it (torture) useful?"
Edited on Sun May-02-04 12:16 PM by mouse7
Thank you Wolf. Your own words showed more about your character and bias than anyone could have ever claimed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's what got me, too
If I were Sey Hersh, I would have said, "Are you out of your fucking mind, you right wing shill posing as a reporter? When is 'usefulness' ever an excuse for torture?" Just unfathomable old Wolfie is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hersh has more evidence!
Hersh is waiting for "a little more" corroboration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wolf looked like his dog died by the end of Hersh interview.
Totally deflated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Don't forget...
Blitzer's real name itsn't Wolf. It's Leslie. Just a reminder.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I never knew that...we should ALL start referring to him as Leslie
Since he created the "Wolf" name no doubt to compensate for all the teasing he took as a kid and to give the appearance of MANLY authority, we should begin a compaing on the left to deconstruct his fabricated macho image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Heh heh...
That was the unspoken agenda. This could be HUGE... This could be the next MORANS!!!!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. omg... I had to google that one...
Not that I did not believe you, just wanted to see it out there. Here it is...ROFL! So he thinks "Wolf" is cool or what?!?

< At a panel entitled You're Only as Sick as Your Secrets, Wolf Blitzer admitted that his real name is Leslie Blitzer. >


http://home.hawaii.rr.com/snlcn/franken/whcd2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hersh laid it on Wolf, and viewers, too -- horror's being perpetrated..
over there, in our name. Wilson and Hersh sounded two blaring alarms this Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. They are alleged. We have a thing in America called the rule of law
supposedly. Fair trials. Innocent until proven guilty, you know? It applies to Jose Padilla, and it applies to those alleged abusers.

Let's be consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Nope.
We have nothing "alleged" about Padilla because he has never been charged. He has only been given a status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's true,
unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Do we have to avert our eyes from the photos and suppose the Iraqis
did these things to themselves? Should we avert our eyes from the smiling faces of those standing over them and assume that their actions were benign? Should we assume that armed soldiers goading naked Iraqi prisoners are harmless and benevolent?

I won't avert my eyes nor suspend belief that Americans committed these atrocities, or the worst, were indifferent and negligent, consistent with my good eyesight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. The perps might be alleged but the army has already confirmed the
abuses took place. When one refers to the PERP it is important to refer to the PERP as alleged...anyone old enough to remember Nixon referring to the MANSON MURDERS and having Manson lift up the paper in court knows the value of referring to the PERP as alleged as it can endanger the individual's chances of a fair trial. The murders themselves were not alleged...the perps were alleged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. with criminal kissinger claiming that they deserved it....

right at the end of the interview....kissinger noted that those Iraqis deserved what they are getting because they slit American's throats on TV....

it took Madelyn Albright to STOP kissinger....she stated it clearly and unambiguously....that this was UN-AMERICAN....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. He is NOT obliged to say "alleged abuses" any more than he's ...
... obliged to say "alleged homicide" when the FACT is indisputable. He may be legally obliged to say "alleged abuser" or "alleged murderer" (before guilt is legally established through due process) but that's NOT what he said.

An allegation of guilt, if stated as a fact rather than an accustaion can be regarded as libelous. We're talking libel laws here - which apply to people, not events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Makes PERFECT Sense To Me...
thanks!

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liarliartieonfire Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. Leslie Blitzer??? (what a wuss)
(Repug whipped)

Anyway, I have a repug neighbor who believes the soldiers who tortured their Iraqi prisoners had every right to do so, how ever they chose to do so.!! He is an old fucker, now, been votin' rupub as long as he can remember. "An' nothins gonna change me now." he says.

He tells me this morning, "Our boys should do that to all them Iranians over there! Bush is doin the right thing, he's fightin for the United States of America. Just like the Japs and Pearl Harbor!!" he yells from across the street.
The old white, right, geezer believes the Iraqis had to be tortured to tell us where that Osama guy is.

He only watches Fox News and listens to Rush on his little old radio. He has a brother in Idaho and a daughter who checkes up on him once a week. She doesn't stay long..so he tells me.

He's about 68, I think, but thats no excuse. My parents are both 80 yrs old. They both remarked, within a week after the bombing of the WTC Towers, that "Our own government did this". They don't watch Fox and don't listen to Rush.

There are many corrupt and brainwashed minds in this country, because of people like Rush Limbaugh.

But hopefully, the media is finally being called on to start telling the truth about the neocon party. It has taken a united movement from people like Wilson, Clarke, DUers, and many, many others. The efforts are beginning to make a difference.

Leslie Blitzer looked like a dufuss this morning, Hersch was excellent.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC