|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 05:44 PM Original message |
Isn't Charlie Rangel calling for BUSH'S IMPEACHMENT? not Rummy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. They are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ljm2002 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-04 12:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
21. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. "Are they confusing everyone on purpose?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. What do you mean "we" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. think he meant Rummy. Said if he wasn't fired or resigned, Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spoon (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. You must have saw a short clip. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I think that's the way I heard it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aunt Anti-bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. He wants to impeach Rumsfeld... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1amc (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. BUSH'S IMPEACHMENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troublemaker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. There was an earlier post that stated that isn't true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troublemaker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 11:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I stand corrected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
49jim (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. On Crossfire today the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. The audience booed? They booed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scrotim (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. A large segment of the audience applauded too. Most were in shock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thecrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I saw it on Cspan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 11:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. I saw that.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. Heard him say it on ABC news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scrotim (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. I think you're right about the press purposefully reinterpereting this for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-06-04 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
17. Rangel is as sharp as a tack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zestfolly (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-07-04 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
20. It was very confusing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC