Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karen Hughes strikes again in the NYTimes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:18 AM
Original message
Karen Hughes strikes again in the NYTimes
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/14/opinion/L14HUGH.html


:puke:


The Abortion Divide

Published: May 14, 2004


To the Editor:

"The President and Women" (editorial, May 9) attributes thoughts to me that I do not believe.

The Americans who marched in Washington recently to advocate pro-choice policies have every right to do so, just as I have the right to advocate my pro-life position.

My remarks on CNN were an effort to find common ground on this divisive issue.

I said, and believe, that after Sept. 11 we have been reminded of the precious nature of human life, especially as Americans of all political philosophies and beliefs fight a common enemy in the terror network that assaults the founding conviction of our country, that all individuals were endowed by our Creator with the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

I suggested that surely reasonable people on both sides of the abortion issue, including a number of my pro-choice friends who also work for President Bush, could agree that we should work to reduce the number of abortions in America through policies like promoting adoption.

KAREN HUGHES
Austin, Tex., May 10, 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. 9/11 can be exploited to serve as a justification
for everything that supports the RW cause, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. ...My remarks on CNN were an effort to find common ground
on this divisive issue."

:wtf: So you make remarks that are even more divisive????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. She makes about as much sense as Pat Robertson, Falwell, Dobson,
and all those other idiots who herd the sheep into the polls for W.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. The NYT forgot a paragraph ...
Edited on Fri May-14-04 04:51 AM by NewHampshireDem
"Our sincere desire to reduce the number of abortions and find a common ground in this debate is why the * administration is backing off its 'abstinence-only' sex ed requirements, demanding FDA approval to allow over-the-counter sales of the 'morning-after pill,' and increasing funding for Planned Parenthood to conduct more outreach into schools and communities."

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. "'After the bombing of Afghanistan and Iraq, we have been reminded...
of the precious nature of human life."
-- What Karen Hughes deeply-suppressed conscience would be saying if given the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. How do we fit abortion and WTC together?
The right wing is not as good in logic as I am and it took me 2 times to make it in that class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Damn it! It's not just a matter of opposing choice,
Edited on Fri May-14-04 06:07 AM by elperromagico
it's a matter of opposing safe-sex education. They not only want women pregnant, they want women ignorant.

Promoting adoption? How many orphanages shall we fill, Ms Hughes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. fill orphanages? No way! We need those warm bodies for the military!
A child army! What better way to fight terrorism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC