Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can a legal corporation be the President of the US?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 11:25 PM
Original message
Can a legal corporation be the President of the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. umm
no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. I would say, unfortunately, that is up for debate!
As amazing as it may seem, I'm not certain that this is technically impossible.

Chilling thought, but I'm unsure. God HELP us if one can....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting question, Cronus.
After all, they can sue in court the same way a private citizen can, and sue as if they were an individual. How do you establish citizenship for a corporation, though? I mean, establishing citizenship isn't important when determining libel/slander in the case of a human being who's disgrunted with said corporation saying or writing in a public forum to express that dissatisfaction ... but for President, it would be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I understand registered corporations have citizenship
Edited on Mon May-31-04 11:42 PM by Cronus
At the location where registered, and they enjoy all the rights that pertain thereto (I could be wrong, that's why I'm asking).

I was wondering if these rights went all the way, or stopped short somewhere short of the presidency.

Click here for fair and balanced yet stunning, insulting, shocking, funny buttons, magnets and stickers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, but......

The corporation has to be more than 25 years old. (Or is it 35?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 35
and no, corporations really do NOT have citizenship, although the case in question, Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company resulted in a supreme court justice stating:

The court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids a State to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, applies to these corporations. We are all of opinion that it does.

Therefore, corporations are given equal protection under the law.

However, the constitution very clearly states that electors will vote for a PERSON for the office of President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. But isn't a corporation considered a person.
If it is, then maybe Halliburton could be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'm thinking that's what we have right now - Bush is the CEO
And the corporation is an industry group engaged in a conspiracy to control the country on behalf of the corporations they represent.

I'm thinking if it's not illegal, we need to get with it. If it is, we need to counter this and make people friendly corporations, perhaps even legislate that if necessary.

Click here for "HERO KERRY ZERO BUSH", "HERO KERRY AWOL BUSH" and other fair and balanced yet stunning, insulting, shocking, funny buttons, magnets and stickers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Another failed business venture in my opinion. N/T
Of course the whole bush family business strategy is to win through losing. The trick is to invest other people's money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. hold for a moment, Dookus
that was in the headnotes for the case. As far as I know, a) the headnotes (summary) for a case do not have the force of law, b) the statement amounts to a declaration from the King, and c) it has never been tested.

Interestingly enough, the court reporter (I think his name was Davies) was a former rail company president, IIRC.

This dictrine needs to be challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Are some of these "requirements" not malleable?
Edited on Tue Jun-01-04 12:01 AM by Cronus
I bet if the American people wanted a younger president they would get one, right? they're already talking about letting an Austrian immigrant become president, so apparently the birth requirement is also malleable, and in the case of a corporation, it would be clearly able to make a case that it was effectively "born" at the time of its incorporation.

Click here for fair and balanced yet stunning, insulting, shocking, funny buttons, magnets and stickers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. No
the requirements aren't "malleable". One must amend the constitution in order to change those requirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes
Since corporations are legally given the status of a person, but the corporation had to be incorporated in the US and at least 35 years old;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. wrong
Edited on Tue Jun-01-04 12:15 AM by Dookus
corporations are only given the status of a "person" as it applies to the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. There's not a court in the land that would decide that a corporation is a person for the purposes of Article II.


Clause 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Well
I guess I will accept your remarks. I stand corrected, but now I am very depressed.
I was hoping Enron could run for office someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's an absurd question of course...
but then the whole concept of corporate personhood is absurd and ought be done away with. Furthermore, corporations should be required by law to take into account in their decision making the well being of their employees as well as society as a whole, not just maximizing shareholder profits. How's that for quixotic? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Could we compromise?

And count corporations as 2/3 or 3/4 of a person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I don't think corporations should have anything other than...
...a paperweight to prevent the legal fiction from blowing on to the floor of a dusty lawyers office. I don't see why, if corporations are considered people, why can't my cell phone contract also be considered a person. In fact, I think it's unfair to all other contracts and legal fiction for corporations to get more rights than they do. I'm for civil rights among legal contracts.

Click here for "HERO KERRY ZERO BUSH", "HERO KERRY AWOL BUSH" and other fair and balanced yet stunning, insulting, shocking, funny buttons, magnets and stickers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Make it 3/5ths
and a Missouri Compromise for good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I like that idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcooksey Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. Isn't that what we have now?
Somebody had to say it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Let's elect WalMart 2004!!!
n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libcurious Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You mean
corporations don't run the country now?
Puh-leezzz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. If that's the case, and if it's illegal for corporations
Then someone needs to sue the Bush Administration because they're representing only a small cabal of wealthy corporations and their officers, not the people.

Click here for "HERO KERRY ZERO BUSH", "HERO KERRY AWOL BUSH" and other fair and balanced yet stunning, insulting, shocking, funny buttons, magnets and stickers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libcurious Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Should have
sued both bushes and the clinton administrations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC