Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Five years ago companies were looking for ways to cut refinery output

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 01:53 PM
Original message
Five years ago companies were looking for ways to cut refinery output
Posted this in another thread, which sank, but in light of the oil prices surging I thought this might make for interesting reading material.

http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/ntn12961.htm

17-06-01 While the Bush administration cites a lack of refineries for energy shortages, internal oil industry documents show that five years ago companies were looking for ways to cut refinery output to boost profits. It takes about four years to build a large refinery so any substantial additional new capacity from new plants would have had to begin by the mid-1990s, energy expert acknowledge.

But internal industry documents obtained by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, suggest that in the mid-1990s oil companies had no interest in building new refineries because of low profit margins and, in fact, were discussing the need to curtail refinery output to boost profits. "If the US petroleum industry doesn't reduce its refining capacity, it will never see any substantial increase in refinery margins (profits)," said an internal Chevron document in November 1995.

The memo cited warnings given about refinery profits by a senior analyst from the American Petroleum Institute, the industry trade group, at an industry conference that year. API spokesman Jim Craig said, "We don't know about these alleged internal company memos, but the idea that the API would warn member companies on profits is ludicrous." A year later, an official at Texaco, in a memo marked "highly confidential," called concerns about too much refinery capacity "the most critical factor" facing the refinery industry - resulting in "very poor refining financial results."

The Texaco memo, written in March, 1996, concluded that "significant events" were required to deal with the excess refinery capacity problem and suggested one solution might be to get the government to lift clean air requirements for an oxygenate in gasoline. Removal of the additive would require more gasoline to be used in each gallon of fuel, tightening supplies.

(more)

Source: AP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most curious....
Edited on Tue Jun-01-04 02:04 PM by DarkPhenyx
....and yet completely unsurprising. It isn't like we would expect an industry to do something to hurt it's profits, or cause it lose stock price. While it is an interesting bit of information I'm not really all that upset about it. What else would you expect a profit driven company to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not surprising in an era of lassiez faire business regulations
However someone had posited that the reason refinery capacity hadn't increased was due to environmental regulations.

Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC