Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush lectures Chirac on what "sovereignty" means

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:07 PM
Original message
Bush lectures Chirac on what "sovereignty" means
Apparently Chirac asked Bush if the upcoming soverignty meant Iraq would have full control and Bush tells the press he told Chirac "Yes, that's the definition of soverignty"....as if he is an expert on language now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
happyending Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. "full sovereignty"
is the phrase Bush has used repeatedly in connection to the new government in Iraq. That is patently false. It's a lie. Just
another lie.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. so that means that, on July first, when they tell our troops to leave.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyending Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. definition
definition of "sovereignty" -

Government free from external control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweettater Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. * can't even pronounce sovereignty
let alone know what it means. His pronunciation is sovereig-nee, instead of sovereign-tee. I have heard him say this many times.....doofus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyending Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. follow the money
Behind the Scenes,
US Tightens Grip on Iraq's Future
By Yochi J. Dreazen and Christopher Cooper
Wall Street Journal
May 13, 2004

Haider al-Abadi runs Iraq's Ministry of Communications, but he no longer calls the shots there. Instead, the authority to license Iraq's television stations, sanction newspapers and regulate cellphone companies was recently transferred to a commission whose members were selected by Washington. The commissioners' five-year terms stretch far beyond the planned 18-month tenure of the interim Iraqi government that will assume sovereignty on June 30.

more here
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/occupation/2004/0513usgrip.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Full Sovereignty" is Full of Bull.
Most Americans might believe it but I doubt if Iraqis will.

Full Sovereignty?
Throughout the spring, as hundreds died in the spiraling conflict, as Regime bosses applied their hardcore "anti-terrorist" tortures to innocent bystanders raked up in their occupation nets, as Regime mouthpieces prated endlessly of "liberation" and "sovereignty," Bush viceroy Paul Bremer was quietly signing a series of edicts that will give the United States effective control over the military, ministries -- and money -- of any Iraqi government, for years to come, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Bremer has placed U.S.-appointed "commissions" made up of Americans and local puppets throughout Iraqi government agencies; the ministers supposedly in charge weren't even told of the edicts. These boards "will serve multiyear terms and have significant authority to run criminal investigations, award contracts, direct troops and subpoena citizens," the Journal reports. Any new Iraqi government "will have little control over its armed forces, lack the ability to make or change laws and be unable to make major decisions within specific ministries without tacit U.S. approval, say U.S. officials."


Earlier Bremer edicts laid the Iraqi economy wide open to ruthless exploitation by Bush-approved foreign "investors"; dominance of such key sectors as banking, communications -- and energy -- is already well advanced. The latest dictates aim to ensure that this organized looting goes on, no matter what kind of makeshift "interim government" the United Nations manage to piece together. Bush's plans to build a Saddamite fortress embassy in Baghdad and 14 permanent military bases around the country are designed to provide the knee-breaking "security" for these lucrative arrangements.



http://context.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/05/21/120.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. God DAMMIT, this guy is such a piece of shit.
We need a new fucking president, SO bad. This is ridiculous.

The man is a CLOWN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC