Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reagan got rid of the Fairness Doctrine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:31 PM
Original message
Reagan got rid of the Fairness Doctrine

Reagan got rid of the Fairness Doctrine, which let people like Rush Limbaugh become millionaires by spreading RW hatred and propaganda throughout the land.

Anybody remember that?

Anybody going to mention that on television?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hahahaha!
Anybody going to mention that on television?

You made me laugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not crying....
over this "loss".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought that it was Bush I that got rid of it?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. pretty sure it left us in 1984
an appropriate year, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Prophetic! One wonders if Mr. Blair (G. Orwell) is able to stop...
laughing, wherever he is. It is true, though, that I was mostly a political zombie through the Reagan years. The constant shock of mortgage interest rates and 'trickle down' economics blew my mind, but good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Fairness Doctrine was outdated what with 100 cable channels....
...and a plethera of internet news sources. Archaic crapola.

Yadda, yadda, yadda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Classic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Likewise what's the purpose of PBS
In the era of 500 channels and the internet? Wasn't PBS a response to the days when most cities only had one or two television broadcast stations?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Exactly! They should be privatised postehaste.
To the highest bidder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well that's certainly a good reason to celebrate his death
Gee whiz.

FDR interned the Japanese.
JFK and LBJ ran COINTELPRO and escalated the Vietnam War.
Does this make their deatjs worth celebrating?

By all means I hope to bring back the Fairness Doctrine, but that was just a cheap shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. so you like the corporate propaganda that passes as "news" these days?
Cheap shot my ass.

It's the truth.

I want the truth told about Reagan. That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bork actually did the deed, though.
Maybe they'll mention the confirmation battle
that resulted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Since there's no Fairness Doctrine
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 05:48 PM by Senior citizen
There's no reason for us to be any more respectful of a puke prez, dead or alive, than the pukes are of Clinton. It's only fair.


:kick:

(Edited typo: "of" for "or")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Limbaugh on the Fairness Doctrine
November/December 1994

The "Hush Rush" Hoax:

Limbaugh on the Fairness Doctrine
By Jeff Cohen

"I, Rush Limbaugh, the poster boy of free speech, am being gang muzzled."

The broadcaster was crying censorship (Limbaugh Letter, 10/93) over congressional efforts in 1993 to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine -- which he labeled "The Hush Rush Bill," "The Get Limbaugh Act" and "The Rush Elimination Act of 1993." Limbaugh's daily on-air crusade generated thousands of calls to Washington, and helped derail congressional action. As usual, Limbaugh's followers were mobilized through misinformation and deception.

The Fairness Doctrine -- in operation from 1949 until abolished in 1987 by Ronald Reagan's deregulation-oriented Federal Communications Commission -- calls on broadcasters, as a condition of getting their licenses from the FCC, to cover some controversial issues in their community, and to do so by offering some balancing views.

Reinstating the Fairness Doctrine can hardly be a "Hush Rush" plan aimed at silencing him, since it was broadly and actively supported on Capitol Hill well before anyone in Washington had ever heard of Limbaugh. In 1987 (when he was still the host of a local show in Sacramento), a bill to inscribe the Fairness Doctrine in federal law passed the House by 3 to 1, and the Senate by nearly 2 to 1, but it was vetoed by President Ronald Reagan. Voting for the bill were such "commie-libs" as Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.).

In 1989 (when Limbaugh was just emerging as a national host), the Fairness Doctrine easily passed the House again, but didn't proceed further as President George Bush threatened to veto it. In 1991, hearings were again held on the doctrine, but interest waned due to Bush's ongoing veto threat. Yet when the same Fairness Doctrine emerged in 1993, with a new president who might sign it, Limbaugh egotistically portrayed it as nothing but a "Hush Rush Law." And his followers believed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Locking.
We are trying to consolidate some of the Reagan
threads. Please continue the discussion here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&a...

Thank you for understanding.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC