Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone else find it ironic that... (Bush drugs/alcohol )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beatrix Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:07 PM
Original message
Does anyone else find it ironic that... (Bush drugs/alcohol )
Edited on Mon Jun-07-04 09:10 PM by Beatrix
Does anyone else find it ironic that it is oh so important that burger flippers at the local burger joint (and practically everyone else - including an increasing number of public school students) are drug tested? In fact, people with a drug conviction may even have a tough time getting a job flipping burgers. Yet, the guy with his finger on the button with a KNOWN drug/alcohol history is not tested and is allowed to have such a powerful position?

Just a random thought...

on edit: Let's also not forget the fact it looks like he's been hitting the bottle when he appears in public frequently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. in most professions drug testing is an absolute joke
I used to work at a call center. We'd sit around, wait for the phone to ring, take orders for computer books.

This company drug tested. If you tested positive, they'd immediately fire you.

While I was there, one of their best employees, a guy who was a total expert at all the books, who could talk shop with the customers, a really super-good employee, tested positive for dope, and they fired his ass immediately.

It was ridiculous. This company was a sub-let place, they'd sublet these services to big huge companies like Microsoft, and they liked to sell themselves with this "we drug test our employees" bullshit.

I didn't work there very long. Hated that place.

Seriously, unless someone's drug-taking affects others, say if you're an airline mechanic or something, drug testing is a serious INVASION OF PRIVACY.

I honestly don't know why it's legal. Unless, like I said, you're a pilot or an aircraft mechanic or something like that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Insurance reasons
A company pays less for insurance premiums (including workmen's comp) if they have an active drug-testing program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Which I don't understand
because how can an employer really be responsible for what an employee does on their off time? Or an insurance company for that matter? It doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Hi Sivafae!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. interesting you mention pilots...story on pilots and "E"
My daughter dated a pilot for about 6 months or so. The reason that she stopped dating him is that he kept using ecstasy, or E. My daughter works for the Treasury Dept (FINCEN) and is considering a job as an FBI agent, so she can't have any 'unclean' friends. She told me that I'd be surprised (horrified) to find out how many pilots use E. Hey, this guy is in his mid to late twenties, makes mucho bucks (his last raise was $17 an HOUR...not TO that figure, but that much additional). He gets paid this money while he sleeps until the next flight, or while he runs through Vegas or wherever he is for a day or two. I worked with a kid who had done a lot of E; he said he really regretted it because his brain was now so totally screwed up from the stuff (and yes, it WAS). Why worry about the odd chance of a terrorist hijacker, when the pilots brains are hijacked? (By the way, for all I know, my daughter was dating this guy as part of her job, not as a love interest...I never can tell)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. so the Treasury Dept. makes its female employees date pilots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I had to take a lie detector test once to work in a book store
for minimum wage. It was sort of a part-time thing for me, which I did while angling for a job in an accounting firm. Very strangely, the money I handled for the accounting firm was in the millions of dollars, which I could have easily stolen with a few swift strokes of the pen, as compared to hundreds of dollars at the book store, yet I was never asked to take any lie detector or drug test for the accounting job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush was rich, that's why.
Another discrepancy involves the lighter sentences for those in the 70's and 80's who snorted coke (usually white with more money) compared with those who smoked it ("crack"). It's the same drug, yet different punishments for their possession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why do you think Bu$h bugged-out of his guard unit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Stewardess'' are drug tested, pilots are not.
Modern slave gang song.


The man says you gotta
peeinna cup
peeinna cup
peeinna cup
Pull yur pants down and
peeinna cup
or they'll
take yur job away.

The mans gonna watch you
peeinna cup
peeinna cup ...etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Airline pilots are randomly tested (drugs/EtOh) ...
just like flight attendants. Check facts, donhakman. You have made a very irresponsible statement here, with very negative connotations to my profession. As an airline captain, I must ask for your apology, a first for me in over three years at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I find it incredulous
that anyone would seemingly take pride in being drug tested or be offended by a comment that pilots had in fact been excempt from drug testing. Of course I was not aware of the policy change. Thanks for the update.

On an opposite note , The US fighter pilots that attacked and killed a Canadian troops in Iraq were encouraged to take amphetamines for "improved" performance. It was brought out that the US pilot who killed the Canadians was in fact on speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Supernovae!
Excellent article, DemoTex! It's something written by someone who knows, well and thoroughly.



Hi, Jimbo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Correct me if I am wrong...
...but aren't all members of the House and the Senate exempt from drug (including alcohol) testing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC