Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Denial from My Local Wingnut

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:26 PM
Original message
Denial from My Local Wingnut
Edited on Mon Jun-07-04 09:30 PM by UTUSN
It's been a busy RAYGUN day, what with all the HITCHENS and all stuff all day long, and I dutifully forwarded lots o'links to my local radio talkshow wingnut. Here are the top 3 links and HIS TESTY REPLIES:

************QUOTE******
(1) http://dominantlee.tripod.com/
.... I, Leola McConnell, do affirm that from the year 1998 until May 2003, I was PNAC member and radio talk show host William J. Bennett's Domina. ....


(2) Reagan "I hope you're all Republicans" story is bullshit

My parents lived in DC when Reagan was shot, and my mother was good friends with an anesthesiologist at the hospital Reagan was taken to. My mother's friend was working on the President when he came in, and was paying extremely close attention to Reagan when the alleged joke was made. Apparently the joke never happened. He said that Reagan was in a lot of pain and was very scared, and was definitely not saying anything, let alone joking with the doctors. He was sitting very close to Reagan's head, as an anesthesiologist is supposed to do, so he would definitely have heard even the faintest words from him mouth. After the media picked up the fabricated joke story, the doctor considered coming out with the truth, but decided against it. I've heard the story parroted back by numerous talking heads this weekend, and it makes me sick every time to know that one of the Right's favorite stories about their favorite President is an outright lie. Spread the word...


(3) It all starts with a little lie. People don't question it and it becomes conventional wisdom for those that wish to believe it. I'm talking about today's Republican Party.

They said the country was going to hell in a handbasket because of the terrible inflation of Jimmy Carter near the end of his term. It was bad but it was not the end of the world. It was mostly created from high energy prices. But the Repubs were able to exaggerate it to a point that they created their own "misery index". But, no one ever called them on it.

Then they said if we cut taxes to the bone, the economy will grow like crazy. We will have more revenues coming in than ever before. Sure enough, after they raised Social Security taxes and cut all the tax breaks for working and middle class people, revenues increased. But we had the largest deficits in the history of our nation. We went from the world's largest creditor nation to the world's largest debtor nation. But, no one called them on it. It became conventional wisdom that they had the right formula.

Then, they said you-know-who won the Cold War. We outspent the Soviets and they collapsed. Yes, they collapsed but not because they got in a defense spending war with us. In fact, and the CIA reported after the collapse, the Soviet spending on defense had remained flat during the period of the '80s. We spent ourselves into huge deficits with massive military spending alongside the huge taxcuts. Still, no one called them on it. The little lie grew and grew.

Along comes a non-curious leader in 2000, with a Republican majority in Congress and every branch of government under their control. They bring out their big lie and present it to the people again, as if it was written in stone. The way to get the economy growing is to cut taxes, they said. Of course, when they said that, the unemployment rate was 4.1% - a record low for modern times. The lie exploded in their faces. Yet, no one called them on it. It must have been some other reason for the downturn and the huge deficits. It couldn't be the big lie that the Repubs have adopted as their conventional wisdom. It must be something else?

********UNQUOTE*******

(1) Why does it sound true to you? What has Bennett ever done or said that make you think he is having an affair with a dominatrix?

(2) Everyone is so eager to believing stories that debunk other storties. Why should we believe this guy, whoever he is?

(3) What big lie, exactly, are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obviously I don't know one way or the other...

I wasn't there.

But, I have seen the individual to whom Reagan said "I hope you're a Republican" say that this actually happened. He further said that he said something like "today we're all Republicans" but that he aws actually a Democrat. He didn't want to upset a man who was potentially bleeding to death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. So He Was a Doctor?
Edited on Mon Jun-07-04 09:57 PM by UTUSN
You have "seen the individual"? If it happened, why wouldn't this doctor/individual come forth with his name on himself?

The other type of these Reverand WEEMS stories is from Tweety: Tweety sez that the difference between Liberals and RAYGUN are that Libs "claim" to love humanity IN THE ABSTRACT, but they (we) HATE individuals (doing "charity" for persons in our face), while bastards like RAYGUN are JUST SO CHARITABLE by giving alms to INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR FACE. He constantly sez that RAYGUN would give CASH to hard-luck people who would approach him.


Um, what are the names, dates, time of the incidents Tweety CLAIMS to broadcast?

The kicker is that, while RAYGUN supposedly did INDIVIDUAL charity, what about the PROGRAMS RAYGUN decimated that DELETERIOUSLY AFFECTED MILLIONS of people---------------ehhhhh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I didn't think this was a controversial topic...

I was not paying that close attention. His name was given. I used the phrase "this individual" because I simply don't remember it. I've tried to avoid most Reagan stuff these past few days, so I haven't taken notes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. O.K., So How About Specifics
like, where did you "see" him, when? And some insight into the depth of your belief?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Your condescension is noted...
Edited on Mon Jun-07-04 10:21 PM by RoyGBiv
It was a documentary, perhaps on Discovery, perhaps on Lifetime, perhaps some other channel ... I'm not sure which. I did a lot of flipping over the last few days, and all of them seemed to have something about Reagan. I was trying to focus on D-Day stuff, but it all got jumbled together.

The documentary covered the assassination attempt against Reagan. There were interviews with people involved in the incident, including the Secret Service agent who was injured, James Brady, and several people who treated him at the hospital. One of those was a person who said Reagan said this to him. He noted his response and why he gave that response.

"Depth of my belief?" I have no idea what you're talking about. I can think of no reason why this person would make up such a tale, especially given that he made clear he was not a Republican, had voted for Carter, and most likely wouldn't vote for Reagan for any reason because, as he said, he was a Democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, I Don't Condescend to DUers
I asked for specifics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Which, I guess, is why you put "see" in quotes...

Perhaps suggesting I had not "seen" what I said I saw.

Perhaps not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well, "see" Means What--------
you WITNESSED with your EYES? Or you "saw" on t.v.? I'm not calling you a liar, am asking what or HOW you "saw".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Further Specifics, Such as
"...Reagan said this to him. He noted his response and why he gave that response."

He (who) noted his (whose) response ?

why he(who) gave that response.


-------so, the (doctor?) noted (RAYGUN's?) response?


--------and what was the WHY about (whatever) response?

Now I really *do* think I'm condescending.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You want a grammar battle?

I am fully armed. :)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Just Want to Know What You're Talking About and
what your beef is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Here are some specifics...
Edited on Mon Jun-07-04 10:43 PM by RoyGBiv
From a site that actually seeks to debunk urban legends.

His name was Dr. Joseph Giordano. The apparent controversy is over the exact phrasing, which Reagan apparently later mutated into a collective statement to try to make the comment a universal appeal. According to this article, and what I saw, the statement was made in the singular, directed toward one individual.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/weekly/aa120197b.htm

OnEdit: Fixed Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I Get This Error from the Link:
******QUOTE*******
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /webapps/whereabout/urbanlegends.about.com/library/weekly/aa120197b.html.

Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: Operation timed out

----------------------

Apache/1.3.19 Server at urbanlegends.about.com Port 80

*********UNQUOTE***********
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Try it now...

I inappropriately added an "l" to the end.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. This Is "Interpretive" Analysis, Not Evidentiary
(Now I really *am* condescending. And I'm checking out to dreamland now. I really don't enjoy "debating" anyway.)

*******QUOTE*******

None of the above are firsthand accounts, of course. And although we might hope and expect to find more agreement in the testimonies of those who were actually present in the operating room, alas, we do not. ....

On the question of reliability, let's be frank. The surgeon, Giordano, was lucid, focused and in command when this incident took place; President Reagan, by all accounts including his own, was weak and groggy. Giordano told the story less than a week after it happened; Reagan didn't write it down until many years later. The odds favor Giordano. ....

As a set-up for Giordano's response, Reagan's line works far better when phrased in the singular and addressed to head surgeon alone. Indeed, the whole couplet as rendered by the president evinces the polish that only an expert storyteller could give it, while Giordano's version comes across as clunky, but, well... real. ....

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Good selective editing...
None of the "above" are firsthand accounts, and these accounts were in reference to the exact wording, not the incident itself. Please take special note of the following, which you conveniently snipped from the beginning of your quote: "That he looked up at his surgeons at that moment and jokingly expressed the hope they were all Republicans has been confirmed by eyewitnesses and is pretty much beyond doubt."

The author then talks about the wording, lists a few variations of the quote, offers that they are not first hand accounts because, obviously, they aren't, and then he mentions Giordano, which isn't, of course, listed in the "above" and actually is a first-hand account.

Believe what you want. I've made all the input into this I care to. You're floating upstream on some odd crusade I don't understand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Your Source
is not: "I, so-&-so, swear that I was present on date/time, and the following persons were present in the room. RAYGUN said THIS. I said THIS. These (NAMED) persons heard this and their statements to this effect are attached HERE."

I cited what somebody posted here. You disputed it, vaguely. I asked for specifics. It turned into this. I choose to believe what a DUer posted here over what you have presented. Got more? I'm going to bed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Oh please...

And "my mother's good friend" does fall along the lines of "I, so-and-so swear that I was ..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Besides Which,, the Quotation I Cited in the Original Post
Edited on Mon Jun-07-04 11:29 PM by UTUSN
was from a DUer. I have no idea as to the veracity of it. But I would lean heavily towards believing a true DUer, like the once I quoted from, if there were nothing to the contrary.

So, O.K., 'night'all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. So, I'm not a true DUer?

Is this your point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Those I Feel Comfortable with Don't Give Me This Amount
of grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Backing up...

As I said, I thought I was trying to help. That one particular piece you quoted conflicted with something I had seen recently, and I said so. Your responses have all been, in my perception, condescending.

Now, you could simply have said that my comments didn't fit with your knowledge, asked me, plainly, where I saw this, or something along these lines. But, beyond your first response, which I answered plainly and honestly, you did not do that. You challenged me, so I accepted the challenge.

I'm sorry you feel as though I've given you grief. I was not aware that simple disagreement would be a source of such consternation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick for the Indignity of Kicking After Working on a Thread n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting this.
I think the SS theft is one of the biggest issues of the past 30 years but it seems as if no one really gives a damn (odd in that it affects most everyone).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC