Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I agreed with Ronald Reagan on something.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
notbush Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:04 AM
Original message
I agreed with Ronald Reagan on something.
Although I can't, and don't approve of the Iran contra funding scandal, I do agree that Danny Ortega was a scum bucket that never deserved to lead that country.
To the peasants who thought Somoza(sp?) was bad, Ortega turned out to be worse.Unfortunately he had agreed to democratic elections.Somoza never did.
The people quickly threw him out on his ass....and try as he might (even paying people to vote for him), he couldn't win an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. We had no business getting involved in Nicaragua
We should not have cozied up to the Contras, Somoza or the Sandinistas. Somoza was a dictator, the Contras were drug runners and terrorists, the Sandinistas were incompetent Marxists.

The US does not have to take sides in every conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
notbush Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. kick
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 02:35 AM by notbush
because I'd REALLY like to hear someone defend Danny........which many democrats did at the time. Most later admitted their mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. A Republic, not an Empire
It was fine to draw a line in the sand in Europe because there was a) a legitimate US security interest, and b) western European states embraced democratic principles. The tinpot dictatorships we supported through the ruse of the "containment" policy were more often than not at the behest of powerful business interests and multinational corporations that didn't give a damn about democracy and freedom.

I am old enough to remember the 1980's, and the sad thing about the Cold War was that it often aligned the US with some of the most despicable, fascist regimes around the world: El Salvador and their death squads, Guatemala, Honduras, Norriega's Panama, the white racists in South Africa, Marcos's Phillipines, the Arab Nazis in the House of Saud, the Afghan mujahadeen (better known as "pre-Al Qaeda"), "South Vietnam", Pinochet's Chile, the Contra rebels and Suharto's Indonesia.

Some may call this foreign policy, I call it Machiavellian bullshit that has only caused a whole new set of problems for future generations to deal with. They will say that the enemy of the enemy is my friend, but more often than not the enemy of the enemy proved to also be our enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notbush Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So explain to me the Democratic support of Mr. Ortega.
I'm not trying to discuss the history of the world....or even the cold war....I'm talking about Danny Ortega. My support of Reagan was specific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notbush Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 1 kick before I go to bed
I should have asked this question earlier.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You'll have to take that up with them
That's their position and not mine. I never argued that the US should have supported Ortega, so what some Democrats said in favor of Ortega is their responsibility, not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michael Costello Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. The US threatened Nicargua before the election
The United States government funded Ortega's election. Imagine if China 's government started pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into the US to try and elect a candidate. The US government also openly threatened Nicaragua if the FLSN was re-elected. The idea that this was an independent decision, especially after a decade of US terrorist attacks on Nicaragua, funding contra slaughters, mining harbors and so forth with the addition of US threats and massive US influx of campaign funds for the opposition, is a joke.

Any American who thinks they can take the moral high ground on someone in Central America after the bloody, evil terrorism and barbarity that the US government was responsible for there for decades perplexes me. It rings in my ear like the former Nazi high command complaining about Israel. I could really give a damn what negative opinion people have on the FLSN movement. Perhaps all of the slaughtered peasants, priests, nuns, archbishops, teachers and so forth in Central America will cheer you up, your side has been successful in making the peasants there miserable, so you can take comfort in the fact that so far you've been winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC