Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FUCK YOU FEINGOLD!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:15 PM
Original message
FUCK YOU FEINGOLD!!!
(am watching the re-run of the senate hearings today with AssKrack)

FEINGOLD wants to know what the Pattriot Act says.

FUCK YOU ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you should have read it you scum!!!!!!!

i did off the MOTHERFUCKING INTERNET

BASTARD :puke:

FUCK OFF!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. he was awfully weak, i thought
just was not on target at all.

pay close attention, Senator Feingold. we are in Big Trouble, in case you don't know yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uhhh...He knows it well
He voted against it.

Feingold is a great senator. A man of true integrity.

I'm proud that he represents my state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. Feingold
I voted for him every time. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. AAAAAHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
where'd you get that picture??????????


hhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. You know that Russ Feingold voting against the Patriot Act, right? nt
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 09:17 PM by Eric J in MN
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
59. In fact wasn't Feingold the ONLY one to vote against it?
Even Wellstone voted wrong on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Breathe, Mat, breathe!
---------------------
An open letter to John Kerry and the DNC:
http://www.geocities.com/greenpartyvoter/OpenLetter.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Feingold was the ONLY senator to vote against the USAPatriot Act.
He deserves credit for taking a stand for freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yeah. The little bit he read he didn't like.
Mebbe he just wanted to see if Ashcan knew what was in it.
When it comes to the law, it seems Crisco Johnny likes to play to his inner NAZI.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/ashcroft.sp.4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. That's what I think....
...that he was testing Asscrack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
He was the only Senator who didn't vote for the PA.

He also didn't vote for the assault weapons ban.

I believe him to be a man of integrity who believes in the Constitution, but that's my own personal viewpoint.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. It might have been a set up to make them answer
the question on the record.

It could've been a sly way to make a point.

Feingold voted against it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. that's my take.
particularly since he was one of the very few who actually voted against the damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Cool it
Maybe Feingold disappointed a few today, but he is still the only member of the Senate to vote against that police state enabling piece of crap.

That is distinction of some honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. And with those gentle words, Matcom concludes his daily
civics lesson for the US Congress.

:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Jesus Christ! Do some fucking research before you rant!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. At least he didn't VOTE for it without reading it like most senators (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Feingold?
I'll take Feingold any day, and I have the two best Senators, I'm from Mass. If you want to insult a piece of shit Democratic Senator, try Shawn Hannity's Friend, Lieberman, the asshole from Conn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. I would too... I have Landrieu and Breaux
Landrieu is probably one of the most ineffective members of the senate and Breaux is a good guy but definately doesn't stand up to the Republicans enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. i understand now that he voted against it. so WHY
didn't he ROCK THAT MESSAGE while grilling ASSKRACK??????

he PRAISED him more often than not!!!

stand up an back up your VOTE i say!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I didn't see the exchange, but maybe he thought he'd get more
I didn't see the exchange, but maybe he thought he'd get more information by being nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Strategy
Let Biden and Kennedy play bad cop.

I'm sure Asscroft was expecting a new hole torn into him by Russ. Not sure he expected it from somebody like Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Matcom, I just watched it again, I think he was setting Ashcroft up in
some cool, calculated way. I could be wrong, but Feingold just seemed to be very measured and calm. I also agree with previous poster, breathe deep, hold for 10 and let out slowly. I've been doing it all day, it works, but barely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. There's still plenty of time to edit your thread title, if you want to. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
42. They might have threated him.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'll cut him slack
Perhaps he did not read it, much like 534 other members of Congress, but he was the only member of the Senate to have the foresight to see that it was just asking for trouble. He voted no, and for that he deserves our gratitude for such an act of political courage during a time of national hysteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. No, he knew exactly what was in the Patriot Act
Probably one of the few who actually read all of it.

http://www.archipelago.org/vol6-2/feingold.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Atlanta Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Feingold and the Patriot Act
I haven't seen or heard Feingold's comments but if true it is indicative of the willingness of Democrats and Moderate Conservatives to cave into the perception that they had to vote for anything that was seen by the public as improving safety and security. It didn't matter that it might not only be ineffective as a means of improving our security or even contrary to those interests. The important thing was to be seen as supporting every effort to protect the nation in the face of the tragic events of 9/11.

We need to hold our elected officials accountable for their actions. I believe the Patriot Act seriously and arguably unconsitutionally (no one would of course challenge this with the current line-up of Nazi Supremes we have on the Court) impedes civil rights recognized as part of our nation's jurisprudence over the past 225+ years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Welcome to DU :^)
---------------------
An open letter to John Kerry and the DNC:
http://www.geocities.com/greenpartyvoter/OpenLetter.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Feingold voted against the Patriot Act.
I had forgotten this, but others on the thread reminded us. Feingold was probably just trying to set a trap during the hearing. Regardless, you are correct about holding elected officials accountable. Bring it on, right to bushco's address.

Welcome to DU!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Atlanta Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Thanks
Thank you "saywhat" for correcting me on Feingold's record on the Patriot Act. But it concerns me that we have elected representatives that vote for bills, especially bills that go to the essential values of our democracy, without having fully vetted them. I realize most members of Congress rely heavily on staff to provide a thumbs up, thumbs down assessment and prepare talking points for committee and floor debate. But this Act, directed at fundamental civil liberties, in the context of 9/11 deserves more attention. We have in effect allowed the terrorists to win by reducing the scope of the constitutional liberties of U.S. citizens. We may win the battle but we lose the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. From what I remember, the Patriot Act was rammed through
(by Democrats in the Senate, by the way), with little chance for anyone to look carefully over its 1,000 some sections. I was under the impression that a lot of it may have been written before September 11, considering how complex it was and how rapidly it was pushed through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
60. Yes, rammed through with great urgency. Just like the War with Iraq!
Sen. Leahy was against the PA. He read it partially, and wasn't liking what he was reading, questioning the need for such a drastic infringement on the civil rights of Americans. He also he feared the enactment of such would set new precedent. IIRC, the over 300 pg document was made available for review at 2 am. Most of the senators didn't even know it was up for a vote.

When Leahy balked, Hatch and Asscroft were sent to cajole him into signing off on it. Stating Leahy would be seen as unpatriotic at a time when the country was imperiled, if he didn't vote yay. Hatch chanted, "We need to give this president broader powers. We're under attack and his hands are tied."

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. Hi lawdem_atlanta!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elf Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Welcome
from Alpharetta!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsAreAlwaysRight Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. So what parts do you have an issue with?
Which item are causing you such pain? Which ones have made your life miserable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I think it's the porn star prom date thing
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
63. part that's making my life miserable is
having to read crap from moranskis that can't even make their way to freepcity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. I suggest you change your thread title
and do a little research before ranting...

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
32. isn't Feingold the only senator that voted against the stupid patriot act?
Feingold rocks. :rocks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
33. As the only Democrat that voted to confirm Ashcroft
I would think that Feingold would have a nagging conscience. He must be working on something. I'm glad he was smart enough to vote against the PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. Not true
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00008


Although it is strange that he and Byrd voted with that group of Dems on this. Some peole believe that the president should be given more latitude when it comes to his cabinet appointments since they are not for life. Feingold has stood firm against Shrub's nominees to the bench, thankfully, since they are appointments for life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
36. Your insults to my Senator won't prevent me and other Wisconsinites
from re-electing him, he would make a great President someday too.
Senator Russ Feingold can be reached by phoning DC(202)224-5323 or WI(608)828-1200 if you want to tell him to fuck off or offer support for his candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I trust Feingold on the Patriot Act
he's a lawyer, his opponent Darrow is a car salesman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. Car salesman
And all three of his opponents are trying to ride Bush's coat tails. "he didn't give the president the tools he needed to fight the war on terror"

I wonder if it'll backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
38. Reading the Patriot Act and know ing what it says are 2 different things
Edited on Wed Jun-09-04 09:23 AM by Jim__
In large part, it's a series of amendments to existing laws. An excerpt from The Patriot Act:

SEC. 104. REQUESTS FOR MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO ENFORCE PROHIBITION IN CERTAIN EMERGENCIES.
Section 2332e of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking `2332c' and inserting `2332a'; and
(2) by striking `chemical'.
SEC. 105. EXPANSION OF NATIONAL ELECTRONIC CRIME TASK FORCE INITIATIVE.
The Director of the United States Secret Service shall take appropriate actions to develop a national network of electronic crime task forces, based on the New York Electronic Crimes Task Force model, throughout the United States, for the purpose of preventing, detecting, and investigating various forms of electronic crimes, including potential terrorist attacks against critical infrastructure and financial payment systems.
SEC. 106. PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY.
Section 203 of the International Emergency Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) at the end of subparagraph (A) (flush to that subparagraph), by striking `; and' and inserting a comma and the following:
`by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States;';
(B) in subparagraph (B)--
(i) by inserting `, block during the pendency of an investigation' after `investigate'; and
(ii) by striking `interest;' and inserting `interest by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; and';
(C) by striking `by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States`; and
(D) by inserting at the end the following:
`(C) when the United States is engaged in armed hostilities or has been attacked by a foreign country or foreign nationals, confiscate any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, of any foreign person, foreign organization, or foreign country that he determines has planned, authorized, aided, or engaged in such hostilities or attacks against the United States; and all right, title, and interest in any property so confiscated shall vest, when, as, and upon the terms directed by the President, in such agency or person as the President may designate from time to time, and upon such terms and conditions as the President may prescribe, such interest or property shall be held, used, administered, liquidated, sold, or otherwise dealt with in the interest of and for the benefit of the United States, and such designated agency or person may perform any and all acts incident to the accomplishment or furtherance of these purposes.'; and
(2) by inserting at the end the following:
`(c) CLASSIFIED INFORMATION- In any judicial review of a determination made under this section, if the determination was based on classified information (as defined in section 1(a) of the Classified Information Procedures Act) such information may be submitted to the reviewing court ex parte and in camera. This subsection does not confer or imply any right to judicial review.'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
43. Jeezus. He voted against it. He was the only one. He gave something
like four floor speeches on specific sections he didn't like.

His big thing was that he wanted parts of it to be subject to state laws, requiring 50 different interpretations of its provisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
45. Would have been nice if he voted AGAINST Ashcroft
I'm still bitter over that one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. Voting
His response about voting for Ashcroft is because he is a presidential advisor. The President has to be given the most latitude when appointing them.

something to the effect..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beavus Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
46. Feingold is going to take Ashcroft's job
Russ is an excellent lawyer and he is a genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. BRING.IT.ON.
let's go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. kick. why don't you wanna keep this kicked now?
you were all gun ho before!!!!!!!!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. You've been doing that just fine. Keep it up. Have fun with it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
50. the trailer for Michael Moore's new movie
shows several senators saying they never read it...that they never read any of the bills they sign.

Maybe this fact will finally come into the light of day.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. you are 100% correct
and yesterday, he backed down. folded. sucked ass.

that's MY opinion. deal with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
55. I doubt John Kerry read it before he voted for it.....
As a matter of fact I seem to recall that the whole thing was drafted while the Senate office buildings were closed due to the anthrax scare.


I don't think ANY of the scum suckers read the PATRIOT Act.


Why should they after all NO ONE THEY know will be subject to it.

One set of laws for the powerful and well connected and another for the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
64. Locking
the issue has been clarified and is being made personal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC