|
is very counter-intuitive.
One would think that with so much air time, they could
a) cover a wide variety of news stories from around the world
b) have hour long (or longer) discussions with people of the left, right, and center. Everyone getting in more than 30 seconds to make a point.
c) Have interviews with leading political figures that actually probe into things, asking followup questions.
d) Not cover the same stories as the other 3 24 hour cable news channels.
But what we get is
a) One story at a time, covered to death by all 4 news networks (OK, maybe just 3)
b) No real debate, just sound bites
c) never a follow up question
d) And while covering that ONE story, no real NEWS about it, just endless regurgitation of the same set of facts.
e) A very limited "news cycle"... 24 hours after whatever ceases to be "news", it's gone and forgotten (prison abuse scandal, 9/11 hearings, etc)
I call it the OJ news... news for people who don't think.
CNN when it first started was more the ideal. I remember their international news hour with reports from journalists in foreign countries and thinking "Cool, so this is what the rest of the world thinks is important and what they think of us, what a great perspective!"
|